Explainer - Judgment Search Results

B. Rajasekharan Nair Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Reported in: (1992)40ITD273(Coch.)

..... in which they had confirmed the transactions with the assessee and explained their resources from out of which the amounts were lent to ..... the reason that the creditor of the assessee has not satisfactorily explained the source for the full amount of the advance sri ..... was advanced through bank balances in the final statement he has explained that it was from his business and property income there .....

Evans Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the eleventh circuit is consistent with holdings in eight other 1 the court of appeals explained its conclusion as follows t he requirement of inducement is automatically satisfied by the power ..... officer based essentially on a bribery rationale as the new jersey supreme court has neatly explained however that case represented a departure from the traditional common law of extortion our extortion .....

Mccleskey Vs. Zant

Court: US Supreme Court

..... but the state s failure to produce this document the majority explains furnished no excuse for mccleskey s failure to assert his massiah claim ..... comity considerations 433 u s at 433 u s 83 and explained that the content of this doctrine is therefore subject to the court ..... u s code cong admin news 1976 p 2485 emphasis added explaining that the not excusable language would creat e a new and undefined .....

Kishanchand Sobhrajmal Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (1992)41ITD97(JP.)

..... his affidavit and repeated statements on oath shri kishanchand had explained and owned these documents the rebuttable presumption under section ..... books maintained by the firm he required the assessee to explain these entries the assessee in its written submissions accepted ..... representing the assessee firm should have made sincere efforts to explain all the documents belonging to the group which were .....

Shrenik J. Kothari Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (1992)LC461Tri(Chennai)

..... as shown in the stock register of the appellant weighment as explained by the appellant after cutting some of the stones weighment ascertained ..... weights he pleaded that the appellant had lead the evidence to explain the weights as entered in their stock register and the weights ..... as to how he came in possession of the goods were explained to the authorities by the counsel for the appellant taking into .....

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Frozen Foods Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1992)(38)ECC280

..... constituent amino acids these are therefore not natural milk constituents summing up shri chakrabarty explained how the whey proteins and casein poly peptides were not natural milk constituents and ..... generation product were not covered by the expression natural milk constituent he had also explained that the respondents were using chemical derivatives of organic origin derived from milk and these .....

Mohammed Omer Family Trust Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1992)40ITD1(Hyd.)

..... and crystallised in the notes and clauses and in memorandum explaining provisions in finance bill 1984 referred to above the ..... purpose of taxation as clearly laid down in the memorandum explaining provisions discussed above that by making private trust arrangements ..... the assessment year 1985 86 and subsequent years the memorandum explaining the provisions of the bill also stated as follows taxation .....

Biswanath Pasari Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1992)41ITD6(Kol.)

..... said firm 10 regarding the balance amount the assessee had explained that it belonged to his unmarried daughter and his three ..... by the assessee and that the assessee had neither explained these transactions nor explained the cheque for rs 5 lakhs before the ..... absence of any satisfactory explanation coming forth from the assessee explaining the transactions recorded in the four sheets of papers seized .....

indra Sawhney and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1992(6)SC273; 1993LabIC129; 1992Supp(3)SCC212; [1992]6SCR321

..... citizens in line with the observation made in triloki nath ii and sagar supra and explained the traits of social backwardness economic backwardness and educational backwardness 82 see also akhil bhartiya ..... runner who has been all along unfettered 156 mr ram awadesh singh an intervener demonstrably explained that as unwatered seeds do not germinate unprotected backward class citizens will wither away .....

Feist Pubs., Inc. Vs. Rural Tel. Svc. Co., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... beyond the scope of copyright protection the district court granted summary judgment to rural explaining that c ourts have consistently held that telephone directories are copyrightable and citing a ..... in no event may copyright extend to the facts themselves b as we have explained originality is a constitutionally mandated prerequisite for copyright protection the court s decisions announcing .....