Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explainer Year: 1951 Page 1 of about 316 results (0.014 seconds)Anoopchand Revashanker Metha Vs. Amerchand
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-31-1951
Reported in: AIR1951Kant101; AIR1951Mys101
..... re grant of inam property appeal against was filed after inordinate delay of 23 years explained by petitioners saying that they came to know about impugned order only after 23 years ..... held explanation offered by petitioners does not inspire confidence of court petitioners duty bound to explain delay satisfactorily by assigning cogent reason and showing bona fide delay not condoned
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Gani and Co. Vs. Trustees of the Port of Bombay
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Sep-26-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Bom310; (1952)54BOMLR273; ILR1952Bom747
..... 272 followed bishan chand v radha kishan das 1897 i l r 19 all 489 explained pallonjee eduljee amp sons v lonavala municipality 1936 39 bom l r 835 natesa aiyar ..... lands limited 1913 a c 319 and steedman v drinkle 1916 1 a c 275 explained and distinguished ex parte barrell in re parnell 1875 l r 10 ch app 512 howe .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJayashankar Mulshankar and anr. Vs. Mayabhai Lalbhai
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-31-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Bom122; (1952)54BOMLR11; ILR1952Bom514
..... v sonabai 1945 48 bom l r 97 distinguished and explained kanji devsi v velji haridas 1950 52 bom l r 405 explained umda v rupchand 1927 a i r nag 1 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the Delhi Laws Act, 1912, the Ajmer-merwara (Extension of Laws) ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-23-1951
Reported in: [1951]2SCR747
..... hence what is known as conditional legislation an expression which has been very fully explained and described in a series of judgments and what is known as subordinate legislation ..... main theories of constitutional law regarding what has been called delegated legislation though as already explained no question of constitutionality of such legislation could arise in england itself such problems .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJoint Anti-fascist Refugee Committee Vs. Mcgrath
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-30-1951
..... includes two groups the first group contains none of the present complainants the attorney general explains that that group is reported as having been previously named as subversive by the ..... the practical reasons stated following note 2 supra the employee does have every opportunity to explain his association with that organization the constitution requires for the employee no more than this .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: Sudhir Chandra Ray Chaudhuri, an Attorney
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-04-1951
Reported in: AIR1952Cal258,56CWN51
..... and unjustly criticised is to move the judge in open court to explain to him that the true facts were not placed before the ..... the mid day adjournment but apart from that want of readiness in explaining the delay the explanation is belied tfy the letter itself the second ..... attempt to scandalise the court either 93 in the letter the attorney explains as to why he annexed copies of so many receipts he .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCalcutta Insurance Ltd. Vs. Commr. of Income-tax
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Nov-28-1951
Reported in: AIR1953Cal59,[1952]21ITR404(Cal)
..... schedule for disallowing it or reducing its amount as i have already explained subject to the adjustments directed by the schedule the actuarial surplus ..... the policy holders shall be deducted since the direction as i have explained is on the basis that to the extent of one half ..... the latter amount is referred to as loss but it is explained in the appellate order of the tribunal that this loss was .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDayabhai Poonambhai Patel Vs. the Regional Transport Authority and anr ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jul-13-1951
Reported in: 1951CriLJ1305
..... against the view that i am taking jurisdiction in the sense explained by me on p 8 see para 12 is conferred upon ..... add that scope of legislation under these entries has been recently explained by the supreme court in state of bombay v narottamdas 1951 ..... not exercise any original jurisdiction in any matter concerning the revenue explaining the difference in the pharseology wallis c j thus observed at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProfulla Kumar Mullick Vs. Sm. Firoza Sundari Dassi and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-27-1951
Reported in: AIR1951Cal182
..... constantly ready with his accounts and to be always prepared to explain them and support them by vouchers but it does not follow ..... that his representatives may be required to discharge this duty to explain matters of which they have no personal knowledge and to assist ..... representatives are different the agent is bound to render accounts to explain the same and support the same by voucher but the cause .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Through the Sessions Judge Vs. C.M.L. Bhatnagar, City Magistrate
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Sep-24-1951
Reported in: AIR1952All56
..... the issue of release warrants and called upon sri bhatnagar to explain why he did not release them 4 sri bhatnagar forwarded his ..... sessions judge through the district magistrate and in this explanation he explained why he could not take action on the orders communicated by ..... for from him even in this affidavit he took pains to explain his conduct in not accepting the surety bonds in the circumstances .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial