Explainer - Year 2011 - Judgments

Feb 23 2011 (FN)

Michigan Vs. Bryant

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-23-2011

..... supreme court reversed his conviction holding that the sixth amendment s confrontation clause as explained in crawford and davis rendered covington s statements inadmissible testimonial hearsay held covington ..... we first employed in crawford and discussed the concept of an ongoing emergency we explained statements are nontestimonial when made in the course of police interrogation under circumstances .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 04 2011 (HC)

Namo Narayan Upadhyaya and ors Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Feb-04-2011

..... carrying danda and which of them was carrying lathi he explained that he had mentioned in his statement recorded by the ..... knowledge whether santosh and namonarayan lived together or in separate houses explaining further that since they belonged to different village and he ..... he was shown the marks of the wheels of tractors explaining further that his brother and other villagers had drawn attention .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 2011 (HC)

Chokki Vs. the Secretary to Government and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-19-2011

..... occurs in the disposal of a representation such delay should be explained by the appropriate authority to the satisfaction of the court ..... in case the appropriate authority is unable to explain personally the delay at various stages then it will be desirable ..... of the court in case the appropriate authority is unable to explain personally the delay at various stages then it will be desirable .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 02 2011 (FN)

Human Genome Sciences Inc (Appellant) Vs. Eli Lilly and Company (Respo ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-02-2011

..... differentiation including control of cell survival or death by apoptosis or cytotoxicity the specification also explains that the first identified member of the superfamily is known as tnf a which was ..... having entangled themselves in a web of horrible verbal formulae must do their best to explain their conclusions where in the past juries simply announced their verdicts 171 nevertheless the powerful .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 2011 (HC)

Shakuntala Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-25-2011

..... of examination under section 313 of criminal procedure code is to give the accused an opportunity to explain the case made against him this statement can be taken into consideration in judging his ..... dharampal holding that failure to draw accuseds attention to inculpatory material to enable him to explain it in examination of accused under section 313 by itself does not vitiate the proceeding .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2011 (FN)

Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club Pac Vs. Bennett

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-23-2011

..... the arguments of arizona the clean elections institute and amicus united states attempting to explain away the existence or significance of any burden imposed by matching funds are ..... public financing does not establish the constitutionality of the matching funds provision we have explained that the matching funds provision substantially burdens the speech of privately financed candidates and .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2011 (FN)

Bullcoming Vs. New Mexico

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-23-2011

..... purposes of the confrontation clause considered sld analyst razatos an adequate substitute for caylor we explain first why razatos appearance did not meet the confrontation clause requirement we next address ..... offered an independent expert opinion about bullcoming s blood alcohol concentration rather the state explains a side from reading a report that was introduced as an exhibit mr razatos .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 12 2011 (SC)

Rajendra Singh VermA. Vs. Governor of Nct of Delhi, and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-12-2011

..... affidavit controverting the averments made in the petition it was explained in the reply that the screening committee of the two ..... prematurely retired from service in public interest forthwith it was explained in the reply that the report of the screening committee ..... it under article 235 of the constitution this court further explained that an action against any government servant consists of two .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 21 2011 (HC)

Gajraj and Others Vs. State of U.P. and Others

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-21-2011

..... the writ petition is barred by latches since petitioner has filed it without properly explaining the delay the writ petition deserves to be dismissed petitioners themselves having entered into ..... diagrams illustrations and descriptive matters as the board may deem appropriate for the purpose of explaining or illustrating the proposals contained in the regional plan and every such man diagram .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 2011 (FN)

Axa General Insurance Limited and Others (Appellants) Vs. the Lord Adv ...

Court: UK Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-12-2011

..... the effect of existing contracts of insurance with retrospective effect in addition as i have explained that decision could not realistically be regarded as representing the basis upon which the ..... than that permitted in respect of united kingdom subordinate instruments carrying direct parliamentary approval as explained by lord bridge of harwich in r v secretary of state for the environment .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Explainer - Judgment Search Results