Explainer - Judgment Search Results

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... prior to nomination of candidates and without any consultation with potential nominees we explained in buckley unlike contributions independent expenditures may well provide little assistance to the ..... and politically motivated investigations into alleged coordination they do not even attempt to explain why an agreement requirement would solve that problem moreover the only evidence plaintiffs .....

Astt. Cit Vs. Omprakash and Co.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)87TTJ(Mumbai)183

..... additions are based on documents seized from assessee s premises and the assessee could not explain satisfactorily the contents of the same 4 the assessing officer observed that during the ..... the assessee submitted its detailed explanation at the time of original assessment the assessee also explained each and every seized paper to the assessing officer when the learned commissioner appeals called .....

Poly Resins Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2003)LC167Tri(Chennai)

..... manufacture of their final product similarly the availability of insufficient manufacturing machines have also been explained by them by submitting that whereas the department has taken into consideration 500 kgs ..... of other machineries and separate inputs for manufacturing each others final goods it was also explained that there was no mutuality of interest alleged by the department with regard to .....

Deputy Commissioner of Vs. United Vanaspati Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Chandigarh

Reported in: (2004)88ITD313(Chd.)

..... higher carriage cost the electricity charges and cost of other material had increased it was explained that regular accounts as required under law were maintained and all expenditure were fully ..... and rejected the book results under extra ordinary circumstances the assessee was not able to explain increase in production expenses and decrease in production therefore the rejection of books of account .....

Fayaz Ahmad Bhat Vs. State and anr.

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 2003CriLJ4381,2003(3)JKJ93

..... has been produced to show that mr sharma had actually explained or translated the grounds to the detenu the service of ..... make representation against the detention at the earliest therefore reading and explaining of the contents of detention order alone will not be ..... in spite of the fact that the grounds supplied have been explained in the language which the detenue understands 10 the underlying .....

Gratz Vs. Bollinger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... undergraduate college are not denied individualized consideration post at 295 as justice o connor explains in her concurrence the lsa s program ensures that the diversity contributions of ..... 20 point bonus without consideration of the particular background experiences or 23 we have explained that discrimination that violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment committed by .....

Stogner Vs. California

Court: US Supreme Court

..... constitutional purposes all are relevant at a minimum the first two of these adequately explain the difference between expired and unexpired statutes of limitations and chase s alternative description ..... methodological infirmities since discovered see authorities cited ante at 619 none of these scholars explained their conclusion by reference to calder s second category there are scholars who have considered .....

Grutter Vs. Bollinger

Court: US Supreme Court

..... minorities is necessary to further that interest ante at 330 respondents and school administrators explain generally that critical mass means a sufficient number of underrepresented minority students to ..... bearing on petitioner s case respondents have never offered any race specific arguments explaining why significantly more individuals from one underrepresented minority group are needed in order .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Orissa Concrete and Allied Industries L ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)1CALLT159(HC),(2003)185CTR(Cal)315,[2003]264ITR186(Cal)

..... shod explanation normally given by the authorities of the government in explaining the delay in not filing appeals not only within time ..... rather impractical to expect the governmental authorities as litigant to start explaining the cause of delay from the last date of limitation ..... not be filed within the period prescribed by limitation and explain the delay for such period for the purpose of linking .....

Coromandel Fertilisers Limited Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (2004)90ITD344(Hyd.)

..... 50b was not on the statute book it is further explained that memorandum explaining the provisions of the finance bill 1999 236 itr ..... separately all of which comprised the said cement undertaking 7 he explained that the transfer of certain kinds of property can be ..... provision is retro active though not retrospective when asked to explain the distinction the learned standing counsel said that the said .....