Explainer - Year 1928 - Judgments

Jun 28 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Dwarkadas Haridas

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-28-1928

Reported in: (1928)30BOMLR1270

..... of the indian penal code balthasar v emperor 1914 i l r 41 cal 814 explained 2 that in any event the accused could have been charged under section 403 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1928 (PC)

Gulabbhai Kanthadbhai Vs. Sohangdasji Mohandasji

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-10-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom183; (1928)30BOMLR535; 110Ind.Cas.263

..... magancharnd 1904 i l r 29 bom 96 s c 6 bom l r 853 explained maharashtra scheduled castes scheduled tribes de notified tribes vimukta jatis nomadic tribes other backward classes .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 16 1928 (PC)

Lingo Raoji Kulkarni Vs. Secretary of State for India

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-16-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom201; (1928)30BOMLR570

..... stale 1908 i l r 32 bom 432 s c 10 bom l r 531 explained the general provisions of the indian contract act 1872 cannot supersede the provisions of a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Narayan Dhaku Bhil

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Mar-13-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom240; (1928)30BOMLR620

..... and need not be formally quashed queen empress v mahadu 1883 unreap cr c 387 explained section 31 4 since repealed tarun chatterjee h l dattu jj jurisdiction of high court .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 01 1928 (PC)

Rathinasabapathi Odayar Declared Major Vs. Gopala Odayar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-01-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Mad545; 121Ind.Cas.126; (1929)56MLJ673

..... what preceded with the words the partition of heritage is now explained by the image of holiness meaning yajnavalkya he says heritage is ..... obstruction sapratibandha 15 what is apratibandha and what is sapratibandha is explained in section 2 at page 8 he considers at what ..... being of two sorts apratibandha and sapratibandha he goes on to explain what they are nowhere is there a statement in the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 09 1928 (PC)

Emperor Vs. Thavarmal Rupchand

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-09-1928

Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR158

..... in american futures in cross examination mr dady mehta was unable to explain how certain items in this book were arrived at the government ..... 20 debited to four different constituents 73 the accused has not explained to what these entries refer i will deal hereafter with the ..... accounts are unintelligible and he is the only person who could explain them which he has not done i am satisfied that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 1928 (PC)

Sri Raja Ravu Sri Krishnayya Rao and anr. Vs. Rajah

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-07-1928

Reported in: (1928)55MLJ894

..... reasons of an adoption from a religious standpoint the ramnad case was explained in the guntur case in vellanki venkatakrishna rao v venkata rama ..... the plaintiff as to how exactly she consulted them will be explained later on of these ramakrishna no 11 consented and the plaintiff ..... nor from a corrupt motive this duty though it has been explained does not seem to me to have been abrogated by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 19 1928 (PC)

Ragho Totaram Vs. Zaga Ekoba

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Nov-19-1928

Reported in: (1929)31BOMLR364; 118Ind.Cas.555

..... sake of the family and especially for pious purposes the meaning of this text is explained thus while the sons and grandsons are minors and incapable of giving their consent or ..... to a distress which affects the whole family for the sake of the family is explained as for its maintenance and pious purposes are described as indispensable acts of duty such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 1928 (PC)

Sarat Chandra Mitra Vs. Charusila Dasi

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: May-24-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Cal794

..... property while half his person is alive 7 but as jimuta vahana explains the wife must only enjoy her husband s estate after his ..... direct authorities in opposition to the principles that i have endeavoured to explain sitaram v dulam kunwar 1918 41 all 350 and rivett carnac v ..... upon by beaman j in ganpatrao v vaman sao 1908 10bomlr210 and explained by mookerjee j in bhagabati koer v sahudra koer 1911 16 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 18 1928 (PC)

G.H.C. Ariff Vs. Jadu Nath Majumdar

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-18-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Cal101

..... 8 a c 473 is the type in which case the principle is fully explained in that case it was held that where there is a parol contract not ..... of the rule in walsh v lansdale 1882 21 ch d 9 is thus explained in odger and odger common law of england vol ii p 869 leases in ..... of equitable estoppel laid down in gregory v mighell 1811 18 ves 328 as explained in the case of ramsden v dyson 1866 1 h l 129 and from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Explainer - Judgment Search Results