Explainer - Judgment Search Results

Mccleskey Vs. Kemp

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that his death sentence reflected a constitutionally impermissible risk of racial discrimination the court explains that mccleskey s evidence is too weak to require rebuttal because a legitimate ..... prosecutorial decisions for example the authors of a study similar to that of baldus explained since death penalty prosecutions require large allocations of scarce prosecutorial resources prosecutors must .....

Keystone Bituminous Vs. Debenedictis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... benefit of private parties identified in justice holmes opinion are present here first justice holmes explained that the kohler act was a private benefit statute since it ordinarily does not apply ..... unconstitutional because they deprived coal mine operators of the use of their land the court explained t he court below ignored this court s oft repeated admonition that the constitutionality of .....

Bowen Vs. Yuckert

Court: US Supreme Court

..... reservations about the slight impairment approach as a threshold assessment at step two it explained t he committee is concerned that the consideration of eligibility for disability benefits be ..... to why the vocational factors must be considered in making disability determinations the secretary explained that t he aging process makes itself felt with respect to healing prognosis physiological .....

iCC Vs. Locomotive Eng'rs

Court: US Supreme Court

..... limitation periods is simply not workable or not workable on any basis the concurrence has explained in the vast majority of cases the concurrence reviews the commission s stated conclusions ..... actual on the record determination that the exemption is necessary to the transaction the commission explained the terms of section 11341 immunizing an approved transaction from any other laws are self .....

Director-general of Vs. Hindustan Lever Limited

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1989)66CompCas51NULL

..... january 1980 without a specific order from the witness and has explained that the respondent had written in advance to the witness ..... loose these tables generated a lot of controversy shri atul tandon explained that consumption of high quality detergents goes up in winter ..... how a tying arrangement i agreement affects competition has been explained by the supreme court of united states 1949 3374 us .....

ins Vs. Cardoza-fonseca

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1985 however the bia decided to reevaluate its position and issued a comprehensive opinion to explain its latest understanding of the well founded fear standard matter of acosta interim decision no ..... citation omitted this statement is simply inconsistent with the bia s opinion as i have explained the bia acknowledged the conflicting decisions of the various courts of appeals and explicitly tested .....

Shearson/American Express Vs. Mcmahon

Court: US Supreme Court

..... use of these arbitration agreements and eventually it proposed a rule to prohibit them explaining that such a prohibition was not inconsistent with its support of arbitration for resolving securities ..... securities dispute 53 ford l rev 279 283 284 1984 katsoris as the commission explained t his code marks a substantial improvement over the various arbitration procedures currently being utilized .....

State of Karnataka Vs. Eshwaraiah and anr.

Court: Karnataka

..... judge has ignored that pw 8 is not given an opportunity to explain his late working and if this opportunity had been given he ..... to condemn the witness without giving him a proper reasonable opportunity to explain a factor when we find that pw 8 is otherwise an ..... material directly available in the evidence of p ws 17 and 18 explains the difference of the ink without considering this material for its .....

Lutheran Church Vs. County of Los Angeles

Court: US Supreme Court

..... proclaims that compensation for a taking must be provided the court makes no effort to explain these irreconcilable results instead without any attempt to fit its proclamation into our regulatory takings ..... should not allow a litigant to challenge the rule unless his complaint contains allegations explaining why declaratory relief would not provide him with an adequate remedy and unless his complaint .....

Bourjaily Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in trials and by a frank recognition of the possible unreliability of these statements as explained above despite the recognized need by prosecutors for coconspirator statements these statements often have ..... why hearsay exceptions satisfy the reliability concern of that clause the court in roberts explained that accuracy in the factfinding process is a central concern of the confrontation clause .....