Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Be Dismissed as the Petitioner Has Not Explained Full Vs. Punjab State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
present writ petition is liable to CWP No.18473 of 2011 -2- be dismissed as the petitioner has not explained full facts of the present case. It is a fact that as per fitment table 12, the basic
“3. the Appellant Was Required to ExplaIn Each Day of Delay. in the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
(Annexure P1), which, in substance, is as under (paras 3 and 4) :-“3. The appellant was required to explain each day of delay. In the case in hand, there was delay of 21 months but there was
“3. the Prosecution Has to ExplaIn Such an Inconsistency in the Firs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
way of order dated 25.2.2014 and repelled the same argument in the following manner:-“3. The prosecution has to explain such an inconsistency in the first information report as well the in the FSL report during the course
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›
AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free