Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Pulse this search
Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search
Mar
20
2013
Be Dismissed as the Petitioner Has Not Explained Full Vs. Punjab State ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-20-2013
of 2011 -2- be dismissed as the petitioner has not explained full facts of the present case. It is a fact
Jan
15
2014
“3. the Appellant Was Required to ExplaIn Each Day of Delay. in the ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Jan-15-2014
(paras 3 and 4) :-“3. The appellant was required to explain each day of delay. In the case in hand, there
Apr
21
2014
“3. the Prosecution Has to ExplaIn Such an Inconsistency in the Firs ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-21-2014
same argument in the following manner:-“3. The prosecution has to explain such an inconsistency in the first information report as well
- ‹ Prev
- Next ›