Explainer - Year 2010 - Judgments

Sep 30 2010 (HC)

Splendor Landbase Ltd. Vs Delhi Pollution Control Committee.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Sep-30-2010

..... directing the petitioner to apply for consent to establish 100 for the reasons already explained hereinbefore this court finds that the impugned directions are unsustainable in law and are hereby ..... was passed restraining the respondents from taking any coercive action against the petitioner 117 as explained hereinbefore the dpcc had no power to require the petitioner to pay environmental damages or .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2010 (FN)

Mcdonald Vs. Chicago

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2010

..... of the basic liberties of slaves free blacks and white abolitionists congressman tobias plants explained that slaveholders could not hold slaves safely where dissent was permitted so they decided ..... a deferential reasonable regulation standard hereinafter winkler scrutinizing see also id at 716 717 explaining the difference between that standard and ordinary rational basis review it is thus altogether .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2010 (FN)

Citizens United Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-21-2010

..... short the court dramatically overstates its critique of identity based distinctions without ever explaining why corporate identity demands the same treatment as individual identity only the most ..... reasonable restrictions on individuals electioneering expenditures in the service of the governmental interests explained above and in recognition of the fact that such restrictions are not direct restraints .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 2010 (FN)

Bilski Vs. Kappos

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-2010

..... transaction under each historical weather pattern id at 21 the patent examiner rejected petitioners application explaining that it is not implemented on a specific apparatus and merely manipulates an abstract ..... account of what constitutes an unpatentable abstract idea indeed the court does not even explain if it is using the machine or transformation criteria the court essentially asserts its .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 21 2010 (HC)

Nayan Sundari BewA. Vs. Subash Chandra Behera and ors

Court: Orissa

Decided on: May-21-2010

..... was not binding on the plaintiff since the said compromise decree was obtained fraudulently without explaining the contents of the compromise petition if any to the plaintiff the learned additional subordinate ..... plaintiff as null and void since the same was obtained fraudulently from the plaintiff without explaining to her the contents of the document d the plea of adoption which was intended .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 02 2010 (TRI)

Enercon India Ltd. Vs. Aloys Wobben

Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB

Decided on: Dec-02-2010

..... arises vii however according to this legal expert it was explained under item 7 of said affidavit how the assessment of ..... the applicants has repeated that this document was only raised to explain said circumstance and besides that it would neither anticipate nor ..... arriving at something falling within the terms of the claims as explained above the respondent was raising a question that difference of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 19 2010 (HC)

Sonu SharmA. Vs. State of U.P

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Oct-19-2010

..... sonu had threatened his wife in the village he could not explain how he had mentioned in the report after dictating report to ..... no plausible explanation has come forth and whatever has been stated explaining the delay is embroidered and is not acceptable it is further ..... the girl in his evidence in court the witness tried to explain the omission to mention the allegations of rape by deposing that .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 10 2010 (HC)

Babu Alias Ravindra Suresh Kamble Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-10-2010

..... the appellant instead of making at least an attempt to explain or clarify the incriminating circumstances inculpating him and connecting him ..... links of facts could if at all have been only explained by the appellant and by nobody else they being personally ..... special knowledge of the accused he was under obligation to explain to show his innocence but unfortunately he has not discharged .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 25 2010 (HC)

Samunder Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-25-2010

..... appellant vijay kumar it was not obligatory for the prosecution to explain those injuries 18 the second important aspect in this regard is ..... 1991 sc 1065 in that case the prosecution was unable to explain how the respondent had sustained injuries the court noticed that ..... of them nor had they called upon the prosecution witnesses to explain the injuries sustained by vijay 26 the learned counsel for the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 24 2010 (FN)

Skilling Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-24-2010

..... of the venire members questioned individually including eight eventually selected for the jury because he explained the court and other counsel have covered everything he wanted to know app 967a inspection ..... earliest application of the theory to private actors a district court reviewing a bribery scheme explained when one tampers with the employer employee relationship for the purpose of causing the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Explainer - Judgment Search Results