Explainer - Judgment Search Results

United States Vs. Robinson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to get indicted for that without the government being fair and being able to explain have him explain before you members of your own community rather than before the agents ibid now ..... counsel s controversial statements refer outright to the government s failure to allow respondent to explain his actions during the preindictment investigation the balance although admittedly more ambiguous are also .....

ins Vs. Abudu

Court: US Supreme Court

..... grounds either of which would have sufficed first it held that respondent had not reasonably explained his failure to request asylum prior to the completion of the deportation proceedings as ..... alien has presented a prima facie case for asylum with whether the alien has reasonably explained his failure to apply for asylum initially and has indeed offered previously unavailable material evidence .....

Godore Tools (India) (P.) Ltd. Vs. Inspecting Assistant

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in: (1988)25ITD193(Delhi)

..... under section 28 iv referring to section 80e which uses the expression attributable to he explained that that expression had the widest connotation compared to the expression arising from business used ..... submitted that the object of the scheme must influence our decision in the matter he explained that competitiveness in the international market depended upon several factors like cost market image .....

Commun. Workers of Amer. Vs. Beck

Court: US Supreme Court

..... internal union affairs referring to the house provisions senator taft explained t he senate conferees refused to agree to the inclusion ..... obligations footnote 6 although senator taft qualified his comparison by explaining that the provisions of the taft hartley law were ..... 452 generally excludes union security agreements from statutory condemnation by explaining that nothing in the nlra or in any other .....

Drill Rock Engg. Co. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in: (1993)45ITD149(Hyd.)

..... examine its own employees further the assessee company could not explain the extraordinary or exceptional circumstances in which the payment was ..... to establish the identity of the payee and failed to explain the exceptional circumstances in which the payment was made in ..... would be evident from the vouchers entries in books etc explaining the procedure the learned counsel for the assessee pointed out .....

Pittston Coal Gp. Vs. Sebben

Court: US Supreme Court

..... repetition testifying during 1977 hearings president arnold miller of the united mine workers of america explained his support for a requirement that labor adjudicate earlier filed or once denied part c ..... refer to medical criteria senator randolph of west virginia the senate manager of the bill explained under the conference report the secretary of labor is authorized to promulgate medical standards .....

Bus. Electr. Corp. Vs. Sharp Electr. Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... based on a detailed examination of common law precedents he explained that in england there had been two types of objection ..... warehouse distributors like morrison id at 1435 judge posner s opinion explained suppose that after sylvania was decided a seller that had ..... respondent did argue before the district court for an instruction explaining that it must be shown that the manufacturer agreed with .....

City of St. Louis Vs. Praprotnik

Court: US Supreme Court

..... respondent merely adequate overall a confidential memorandum from one of respondent s superiors to kindleberger explained that respondent did not get along well with others citing as an example respondent s ..... evidence footnote 2 6 indeed the plurality appears to acknowledge as much when it explains that the custom or usage doctrine will forestall egregious attempts by local governments to insulate .....

Gardebring Vs. Jenkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and responsibilities of applicants for and recipients of assistance specifically developed bulletins or pamphlets explaining the rules regarding eligibility and appeals in simple understandable terms are publicized and ..... comments continued to acknowledge the distinction between applicants and recipients but did not explain the deletion of the term recipients from the text of the rule itself n .....

Mccoy Vs. Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... court that an appeal is frivolous without impairing his or her client s constitutional rights explaining the basis for the frivolousness conclusion does not burden the rights to effective representation ..... s fundamental rights it must follow that no constitutional deprivation occurs when the attorney explains the basis for that conclusion a supported conclusion that the appeal is frivolous does not .....