Explainer - Judgment Search Results

Shripadbhat Anantbhat Joshi Vs. Rama Babaji Lathi

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1927Bom270; (1927)29BOMLR274; 101Ind.Cas.340

..... within the meaning of the section narayan v pandurang 1922 24 bom l r 831 explained a suit brought by a tenant against a third person does not operate as res .....

Timmanna Parmeshwar Bhat Vs. Govind Ganpati Bhat

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR523; 94Ind.Cas.656

..... with the terms of the decree bhimangauda v hanmant 1918 20 bom l r 411 explained the collecctor when asked to partition lands in accordance with a decree must follow the .....

Sobhagmal Gianmal Vs. Mukundchand Balia

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR1376

..... no element of wagering in the transactions the course of business of a culcha adatia explained manilal dharamsi v allbhai chaglu 1922 i l r 47 bom 263 s c 24 .....

Raghunath Shivram Kulkarni Vs. Narayan Chintaman Deshmukh

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1926)28BOMLR543; 95Ind.Cas.267

..... madhav 1921 i l r 46 bom 463 s c 23 bom l r 1238 explained maharashtra scheduled castes scheduled tribes de notified tribes vimukta jatis nomadic tribes other backward classes .....

E. St. C. Moss and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1927Cal460

..... section 46 excise act and section 120b indian penal code read and explained to the jury this is all obviously it is impossible for ..... from these words whether the law was or was not correctly explained mr pugh further contends that it is obvious that the law ..... 46 does not require much elaborate explanation the judge would have to explain to the jury what an excisable article was and beyond this .....

Kessoram Poddar and Co. Vs. Secretary of State

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1928Cal74

..... a letter in which the following expression occurs this will as explained by your representative to me complete all outstanding orders placed ..... regard to the allegations contained in this paragraph they are further explained in the particulars furnished by the defendant in february 1925 ..... by the east india company 35 the position has been explained in the case of peninsular and oriental s n co .....

Adam Ali Taluqdar and ors. Vs. King-emperor

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1927Cal324

..... which must be gathered from the circumstances of the case he also explains section 304 very carefully and points out that to find them guilty ..... person acted 8 mr taluqdar next contends that the learned judge never explained to the jury the law on the subject of the right ..... has appeared for him has contended that the judge did not correctly explain to the jury the law of abetment he contends that abdul .....

Balaji Singh Vs. Chakka Gangamma and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1927Mad85; (1926)51MLJ641

..... 1889 was retrospective in effect section 11 was enacted in order to explain the expression voluntary settlement in section 38 c of the customs ..... in the preamble it is stated whereas it is expedient to explain certain provisions of the transfer of property act the preamble and ..... when any phrase or word or expression in an enactment is explained by the legislature the act has to be applied with the .....

Sri Rajah Ravu Sri Krishna Rao Alias Sri Rajah Ravu Venkatakumara Mahi ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1927Mad733; 102Ind.Cas.713

..... as they are referred to in them or are required to explain them the case of these other documents need not be ..... suit i shall briefly narrate the following predigree will serve to explain the relationship of the parties niladri rao baviamma surya rao lakshmi ..... for india air1926mad881 the word majority in this passage has been explained by the privy council as being a substantial majority kristnayya v .....

Raffel Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... disclose that he had not testified at the first trial and to explain why he had not done so the questions and answers are ..... united states supra 178 u s 316 his failure to deny or explain evidence of incriminating circumstances of which he may have knowledge may be ..... rule that he may remain silent or at his option testify fully explaining his previous silence we are unable to see that the rule that .....