Explainer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explainer Year: 1984 Page 1 of about 1,204 results (0.018 seconds)income Tax Officer Vs. S.P. Jain
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: Oct-09-1984
Reported in: (1985)13ITD288(Kol.)
..... rana though several opportunities were given the rana did not appear before the authorities to explain the circumstances under which he purchased those shares but only his letter was produced wood ..... the legal representative but the deceased whose representative is assessed qua him as has been explained above by salmond on jurisprudence referred to above this representative bears the person of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFirefighters Vs. Stotts
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-12-1984
..... prevented contract liability from arising between the city and the affected white employees as is explained more fully infra the preliminary injunction did not require the city to lay off anyone ..... is enforceable in court it has qualities of both voluntariness and compulsion the court has explained that congress intended to encourage voluntary settlement of title vii suits carson v american brands .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFcc Vs. League of Women Voters
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1984
..... president national association of educational broadcasters while others took a different view explaining that although specific endorsements of political candidates would be inappropriate editorials concerning civic ..... requested a conference and only receded from its disagreement when it was explained that the prohibition was limited to providing that no noncommercial educational broadcast station .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPennhurst State Sch. Vs. Halderman
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-23-1984
..... brennan dissenting i fully agree with justice stevens dissent nevertheless i write separately to explain that in view of my continued belief that the eleventh amendment bars federal court ..... young and its predecessors is consistent with established sovereign immunity doctrine but it also explains the critical difference between actions for injunctive relief and actions for damages recognized in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.R. Arulprakasam Vs. Income-tax Officer
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Madras
Decided on: Dec-20-1984
Reported in: (1985)11ITD752(Mad.)
..... 698 he has also made enquiries with the assessee to explain the discrepancies in receipts in films business and the expenses ..... letters were available were taken into account the assessee could have explained the inflated expenses claimed in the trading and profit and ..... not mean that the assessee is absolved of his responsibility to explain the purpose of maintaining three sets of accounts the chart .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBose Corp. Vs. Consumers Union
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-30-1984
..... he responded at length to technical testimony by dr bose explaining the scientific explanation for the apparent movement of the source ..... evolves and its integrity is maintained footnote 21 as we have explained the meaning of some concepts cannot be adequately expressed in ..... review of the evidence on the dispositive constitutional issue we explained our action as follows this court s duty is not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSecretary of Interior Vs. California
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-11-1984
..... proposal with the administrator 118 cong rec 14183 1972 in proposing the amendment senator boggs explained his concern with offshore oil transfer terminals located at sites outside the 3 mile territorial ..... when a lease is sold footnote 22 the house report accompanying the 1978 ocsla amendments explained the consistency review provision imposed at the production stage is intended to provide the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Leon
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-05-1984
..... context of concrete cases the nature of our constitution as chief justice marshall long ago explained requires that only its great outlines should be marked its important objects designated and the ..... an opinion written in 1949 and endorsed by the court last term in gates we explained these long prevailing standards seek to safeguard citizens from rash and unreasonable interferences with privacy .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDavis Vs. Scherer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1984
..... informed appellee by memorandum that permission to accept the employment was revoked as capt sconiers explained at trial his superiors in the highway patrol had determined that appellee s reserve ..... appellee s continued employment and their conversations with appellee appellee also wrote to capt sconiers explaining that he saw no reason to resign his outside employment so advised capt sconiers .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGrove City Coll. Vs. Bell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-28-1984
..... of its enactment and there are no authoritative committee reports page 465 u s 587 explaining the many compromises that were eventually enacted including the program specific limitations that found ..... to educational institutions see generally 45 cfr pt 80 1972 for example 80 4 d explained the assurances required from among others institutions of higher education that received federal financial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial