Skip to content


Smt Sunita vs.state & Anr. - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided On
AppellantSmt Sunita
RespondentState & Anr.
Excerpt:
.....quashing fir no.1433/2015 dated 20.11.2015 registered at ps – burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.2. 3. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state.4. with the consent of all the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present crl.m.c.3600/2019 page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.6. respondent no.2 is personally present in court and he has been identified by si - prakash /io, ps - burari and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.7. the petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated.....
Judgment:

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:

03. 12.2019 + CRL.M.C. 3600/2019 SMT SUNITA Through: Mr. R.S. Rai, Adv. ........ Petitioner

versus STATE & ANR. Through: Mr. K.K. Ghai, APP for State with SI ........ RESPONDENTS

Prakash, PS - Burari CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT JUDGMENT

(ORAL) 1. Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby quashing FIR No.1433/2015 dated 20.11.2015 registered at PS – Burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State.

4. With the consent of all the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL.M.C.3600/2019 Page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.

6. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and he has been identified by SI - Prakash /IO, PS - Burari and submits that matter has been settled and he does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. The petitioners and respondent no.2 have entered into an amicable settlement vide settlement deed dated 06.09.2018.

8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioners any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.1433/2015 dated 20.11.2015 registered at PS – Burari and all other proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed accordingly. Dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER03 2019 PB CRL.M.C.3600/2019 Page 2 of 2


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //