Court : Delhi
$~53 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision:29. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12573/2019 M/S HUDSON OVERSEAS ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, Ms. Jasmeet Kaur & Ms. Shweta Dhaka, Advs. versus COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS (EXPORTS) ICD, TKD, NEW ........ RESPONDENTS DELHI AND ORS. Through: Mr. Amit Bansal, SSC with Mr.Aman Rewaria, Adv. for R-1 & R-2 Mr. Aditya Singla, SSC for R-3 CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR D.N. PATEL, Chief Justice (Oral) JUDGMENT This writ petition has been preferred with the following prayers:1. (a) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of certiorari to set-aside the seizure memorandum bearing F.No.DRI/IZU/INT-75/2019/3718 to 3721 dated 31.08.2019 with reference to shipping bill No.4651654 dated 04.06.2019; and/or (b) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus to the... RESPONDENTS to issue the release of the goods detained against Shipping Bill No.4651654 dated 04.06.2019...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
* % + IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019. CS(OS) 1582/2013, IA No.14425/2015 (u/O XXXIX R-2A CPC), IA No.15458/2017 (u/O XVA r/w S-151 CPC), IA No.15459/2017 (u/O XII R-6 CPC) & OA No.146/2019 (of D-1 against order dated 22nd July, 2019) RITNAND BALVED EDUCATION FOUNDATION ..... Plaintiff Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Ms. Ruchira V. Arora, Mr. Rajan Chawla, Mr. Tanmaya Mehta & Mr. Shyam Singh, Advs. Versus OM SAI MANDIR NYAS TRUST (REGD) & ANR.. Defendants Through: Mr. Anurag Ahluwalia & Mr. Akash Nagar, Advs. for D-1. Ms. Saahila Lamba, Adv. for D-3. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1 The plaintiff has instituted this suit for recovery of possession of 166.98 sq. mtrs. forming part of the property at site No.2, Mayur Vihar Phase-I, Delhi allotted by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA) to the plaintiff, and for recovery of mesne profits and injunction.2. The suit was entertained and vide ad-interim order dated 16th September, 2013, ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~10 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + Delivered on:29. h November, 2019 RFA3372019 & CM APPL No.17611/2019 ZASHA ADVERTISING PVT LTD ..... Appellant Through: Mr.Dhruv Kapur and Mr.Maharshi Kalra, Advocates. versus ABHIJIT ROY ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YOGESH KHANNA Through: Mr.Vikram Singh, Advocate. YOGESH KHANNA, J.1. This appeal is preferred by the appellant/plaintiff against the order dated 07.01.2019 passed by the learned Additional District Judge-4/ South-West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi (hereinafter referred as the learned Trial Court) in CS No.18/2019 whereby the suit of the appellant under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of Rs.4,71,320/- against the respondent/defendant was dismissed in limine.2. a) The brief facts are: on 26.05.2018 the Respondent placed purchase order upon the Appellant at Delhi for taking the Appellant's service for branding AC bus with effect from 27.05.2018 for a period of one month at the rate of Rs.78,000/- excluding ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~A-30 * % IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. 11.2019 + O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 486/2019 INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LIMITED THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, DEBASISH NANDA........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Ritu Bhalla & Ms. Riya Basu, versus Advocates NAYARA ENERGY LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS ESSAR OIL LIMITED) THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, PANKAJ TRIPATHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Anuradha Mukherjee, Ms. Jyoti Dastidar & Ms. Shuchita Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, J.(ORAL) I.A. 16784/2019 Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application stands disposed of. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 486/2019 1. Present petition has been jointly filed by the parties under Section 29A(4) & (5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Act) seeking extension of time for completion of the arbitral proceedings and passing of the Award. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 486/2019 Page 1 of 2 2. It is averred in the petition that the Arbitral ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~10, 11 and 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + S BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS CM (M) 214/2019 and CM APPL. 6012/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for with (M: person in... Petitioner 9871339314). VIDYUT ARORA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, Advocate (M:98110. 6767). WITH11and 16 + CM (M) 266/2019 and CM APPL. 7204/2019 CM (M) 829/2019 and CM APPLs. 25224/2019, 25225/2019, 39211/2019 VIDUT ARORA Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, ........ Petitioner Advocate (M:98110. 6767). S-BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for R- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH13,8,9,12 and 13 (M:98713. 9314). Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. These three petitions relate to the Residents Welfare Association of S- Block, GK-1, known as the S-Block Welfare Society. The elections to the said society were held on 30th April, 2017 and the same...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~10, 11 and 16 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + S BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS CM (M) 214/2019 and CM APPL. 6012/2019 ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for with (M: person in... Petitioner 9871339314). VIDYUT ARORA & ANR versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, Advocate (M:98110. 6767). WITH11and 16 + CM (M) 266/2019 and CM APPL. 7204/2019 CM (M) 829/2019 and CM APPLs. 25224/2019, 25225/2019, 39211/2019 VIDUT ARORA Through: Mr. Sunil Goyal and Mr. Deepak, ........ Petitioner Advocate (M:98110. 6767). S-BLOCK WELFARE SOCIETY & ORS versus ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Mr. Shivam Goel, Advocate for R- CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH13,8,9,12 and 13 (M:98713. 9314). Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. These three petitions relate to the Residents Welfare Association of S- Block, GK-1, known as the S-Block Welfare Society. The elections to the said society were held on 30th April, 2017 and the same...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~12 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Decided on 29th November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 8799/2018 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION Through ........ Petitioner Versus DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Through: Mr. Arjun Pant, Adv. ..... Respondent CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2911.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) 1. This writ petition has been initiated by this Court on its own motion mainly for the reason that a letter was received by the Registrar General of this Court dated 14th November, 2017, wherein author of the letter has mentioned about the illegal construction at Village Poonthkalan, Delhi-110086.2. Counsel appearing for the respondent submits that they will verify the facts mentioned in the letter and that, if there is any unauthorised construction, the same will be removed by the respondent, in accordance with law.3. In view of the above submission, we hereby direct the respondent to arrive at the conclusion, initially, whether the construc...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~58 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 12613/2019 MANJINDER SINGH SIRSA ........ Petitioner Through: Mr. A.P.S. Ahluwalia, Sr. Advocate with Mr. S.S. Ahluwalia and Mr. Mohit Bangwal, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS ........ RESPONDENTS Through: Ms. Maninder Acharya, ASG with for CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR W.P.(C) 12613/2019 Page 1 of 4 Mr. Anil Soni, CGSC respondent No.1 Mr. Mukesh Gupta, Standing Counsel with Ms. Shashi Gupta and Mr. Mayank Ahuja, Advs. for SDMC Mr. Ramesh Singh, Sr. Standing Counsel with Mr. Shlok Chandra, Mr. Ishan Agarwal, Mr. Rishabh Tomar, Advs. and Inspector Vinay Kumar, Licensing D.P. for respondent nos. 2 and 4 Mr. Atul Verma, Adv. for Mr. Sanjeev Ralli, Adv. for respondent No.5 Ms. Standing Counsel for North Delhi Municipal Corporation Mr. Harish Kumar Khinchi and Mr. Ghanshyam Thakur, Advs. for EDMC/R-8 Jyoti Taneja, % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) ORDER2911....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~13 *IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + W.P.(C) 10036/2018 PRAKASH CHAND ........ Petitioner Through: Ms. Suman Chauhan, Adv. versus DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD THROUGH ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER Respondent Through: Mr. Parvindu Chauhan, Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR ORDER2911.2019 % D.N. PATEL, CHIEF JUSTICE (ORAL) W.P.(C) 10036/2018 1. This so-called Public Interest Litigation (PIL) has been preferred with the following prayers: (i) Directing Respondent to construct Library in H-Block. (ii) Directing Respondent to provide Status Report as to construction of Library in H-Block. (iii) Any other relief which court may deem fit in the interest of justice, equity and good conscience. 2. Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that suffice it will be for the disposal of this writ petition if direction is given to the respondent W.P.(C) 10036/2018 Page 1 of 2 to treat this writ petition ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Delhi
$~5 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision:29. h November, 2019 + CM (M) 25/2018 KAMALA CHAMOLI & ANR ........ Petitioners Through: Mr. Syed Hasan and Mr. Parvez Zaidi, Advocates. (M:99900. 7910) versus M/S PRE PRESS MACHINERY & SERVICES PVT LTD CORAM: JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH Through: None. ..... Respondent Prathiba M. Singh, J(oral) 1. Pursuant to the order dated 12th July, 2019, ld. counsel for the... Petitioners has placed on record a detailed affidavit of facts. In the said affidavit, along with all the facts, the RTI Reply dated 5th February, 2019, issued by the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Office of the Registrar of Companies, has been attached, which shows that the name of the Respondent/Plaintiff (hereinafter, Plaintiff) company was struck off under Section 560 (5) of the Companies Act, 1956, under the Easy Exit Scheme, 2011 on 18th March, 2011.2. Ld. counsel for the... Petitioners submits that the suit for recovery under Order XXXVII CPC was filed by th...
Tag this Judgment!