Skip to content
How to use Judgment tools
  1. Click Tools to open PDF, Print, Tag, Note, Favourite, and CiteSignal.
  2. Use Brief & Ask in the toolbar for the AI Brief and case chat.
  3. Jump to sections with the pills below the help bar.

Kulbir Singh vs.state & Anr

Kulbir Singh vs State & Anr

Type Court Judgment Court Delhi Decided Dec 03, 2019
~2 min read
https://sooperkanoon.com/case/1227018

For advocates & juniors · 7-day free trial

Brief this judgment before chambers

Stop skimming 50 pages - get an 18-section AI Brief on this case, ask scoped follow-ups, and find related precedents with Semantic Search. Full trial, no card required.

  • 18-section brief - facts, issues, ratio, relief
  • Ask this case - answers cite the judgment
  • Semantic search - find precedents by meaning
  • Research drawer - sections, cites, related cases

No card required · credentials emailed · Log in if you already have an account

Citation
Court
Delhi High Court
Decided On
Subject
Criminal

Case Summary

AI-generated summary - not the official court judgment text.

Criminal

Key legal issue
Criminal

Parties & Advocates

Appellant / Petitioner

Kulbir Singh

Respondent

State & Anr

Excerpt

.....emanating therefrom.2. 3. notice issued. notice is accepted by learned app for the state and respondent no.2.4. with the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.5. the present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent no.2 has no objection if the present crl.m.c.4787/2019 page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.6. respondent no.2 is personally present in court and she has been identified by si gurbachan singh/io and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.7. the petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into a compromise whereby the petitioner and respondent no.2 got married with each other at gurudawara parkash kutti, udasi ashram, majnu ka tilla, delhi on 01.09.2019.8. taking into account the aforesaid facts, this court is inclined to quash the fir as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.9. for the reasons afore-recorded, the fir no.591/2017 dated 13.10.2017, registered at police station - burari, for the offence punishable under section 354(c) ipc and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.10. the petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.11. order dasti. (suresh kumar kait) judge december03 2019/ab crl.m.c.4787/2019 page 2 of 2

Full Judgment

$~3 * + 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI CRL.M.C. 4787/2019 Date of decision:

03. 12.2019 KULBIR SINGH ........ Petitioner

Through Mr.Umesh Gupta, Adv. with Ms.Sushma, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus STATE & ANR Through Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for State. SI Gurbachan Singh PS Burari. Respondent no.2 in person. ........ RESPONDENTS

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT Vide the present petition, the petitioner seeks direction thereby JUDGMENT

(ORAL) quashing FIR No.591/2017 dated 13.10.2017, registered at Police Station - Burari, for the offence punishable under Section 354(C) IPC and all other proceedings emanating therefrom.

2. 3. Notice issued. Notice is accepted by learned APP for the State and respondent no.2.

4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the present petition is taken up for final disposal.

5. The present petition is filed on the ground that the parties have settled their disputes and the respondent No.2 has no objection if the present CRL.M.C.4787/2019 Page 1 of 2 petition is allowed.

6. Respondent No.2 is personally present in Court and she has been identified by SI Gurbachan Singh/IO and submits that matter has been settled and she does not wish to prosecute the matter any further.

7. The petitioner and respondent no.2 have entered into a compromise whereby the petitioner and respondent no.2 got married with each other at Gurudawara Parkash Kutti, Udasi Ashram, Majnu Ka Tilla, Delhi on 01.09.2019.

8. Taking into account the aforesaid facts, this Court is inclined to quash the FIR as no useful purpose would be served in prosecuting the petitioner any further.

9. For the reasons afore-recorded, the FIR No.591/2017 dated 13.10.2017, registered at Police Station - Burari, for the offence punishable under Section 354(C) IPC and consequent proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

10. The petition is allowed and disposed of accordingly.

11. Order dasti. (SURESH KUMAR KAIT) JUDGE DECEMBER03 2019/ab CRL.M.C.4787/2019 Page 2 of 2

Continue Your Research


AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial