Explicator - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Eicher Tractors Ltd., Haryana Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(72)ECC673; 2000(122)ELT321(SC); 2000(7)SCALE483; 2001(1)LC361(SC)

sub rule 3 9 these exceptions are in expansion and explicatory of the special circumstances in section 14 1 quoted earlier

H. Surendra Shetty Vs. Vijaya Bank, Bangalore and Another

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2000KAR2883; 2000(5)KarLJ436

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

Stenberg Vs. Carhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to the limit of my belief obviously irreconcilable with casey s explication of what its undueburden standard requires post at 983 but i ..... never put much stock in casey s explication of the inexplicable in the last analysis my judgment that casey ..... 877 today s decision is so obviously irreconcilable with casey s explication of what its undue burden standard requires let alone the .....

Secure Meters Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

..... so as to make the nicety of the issue involved in two distinct interpretations self explicable and to facilitate an easy understanding suppose the export profits are of rs 7 lakhs .....

G. Chinaswamy Naidu Vs. K. Padmanabhaiah

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(6)ALD92; 2000(5)ALT443

..... district to order transfer op no 410 of 1998 filed by the respondent herein is explicity stated by the learned district judge himself in paragraph 6 of the order which reads .....

Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000IVAD(Delhi)342; 86(2000)DLT246

..... and restoration of the environment the claim for damages for loss suffered by villagers was explicity left to be agitated in a suit t kumari v state of tamil nadumr desai .....

Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. Vs. Maruti Udyog Ltd. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000(54)DRJ494

..... the view that the judgment on admission under order xii rule 6 cpc must be explic it the hon ble supreme court in chikkam koteswara rao vs chikkam subbarao ors air1971sc1542 .....

Adarsh Mahila Siksha Pratisthan and ors. Vs. the Calcutta Municipal Co ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)2CALLT47(HC)

..... enough for taking so much time for filing of the case there has been an explicable delay caused by the petitioners 14 it is true that there has been no straight .....

United States Vs. Mead Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s opinion have no antecedent in our jurisprudence chevron the case that the opinion purportedly explicates made no mention of the relatively formal administrative procedure s ante at 230 that the .....

Hill Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the scene of the dispute id at 10l the court followed these observations with an explication of fundamental free speech principles i would have thought controlling in the present case it .....