Explicator - Judgment Search Results

James Vs. Strange

Court: US Supreme Court

..... encourages indigents to do without counsel and consequently infringes on the right to counsel as explicated in gideon v wainwright supra 323 f supp 1230 1233 in gideon counsel had been .....

Eisenstadt Vs. Baird

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is the proper function of this court to dismiss as dubious a state court s explication of a state statute absent overwhelming and irrefutable reasons for doing so page 405 u .....

R.B. Seth Moolchand Suganchand Vs. the Commissioner of Income Tax, Del ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC15; [1972]86ITR647(SC); (1973)3SCC257; [1973]2SCR360; 1972()WLN720

..... of each case but the difficulty in matching them with the seeming irreconcilablity are perhaps explicable only on the ground that the determination in any particular case is dependant on the .....

Neil Vs. Biggers

Court: US Supreme Court

..... already overburdened system of criminal justice footnote 1 in this light we review our cases explicating the disposition affirmed by an equally divided court on what was apparently the first occasion .....

Pipefitters Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... not pertinent here footnote 19 to codify the court decisions interpreting and the legislative history explicating section 610 and to spell out in page 407 u s 411 more detail what .....

United State Vs. Byrum

Court: US Supreme Court

..... or the income therefrom 26 u s c 2036 a 1 and 2 our cases explicate this congressional directive to mean that if one wishes to avoid a tax at death .....

Furman Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the question in any event is of minor significance this court has never attempted to explicate the meaning of the clause simply by parsing its words footnote 2 21 the danger .....

Ambalal D. Bhatt Vs. the State of Gujarat

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1972SC1150; 1972CriLJ727; (1972)3SCC525

..... laboratory from 8 11 62 to 23 11 62 cannot be correct and is only explicable on he basis of what the appellant says lamely that he got 5 kg on .....

Manchida Vs. State

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1972WLN867

..... was inclined to believe the existence of damage on the kidney the doctor has also explicated thus it is not possible to injure the kidney by the doctor operating on exploration .....

Om Parkash Kumar Vs. the State of Himachal Pradesh

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 1974CriLJ556

..... the statement of the accused as a whole his conduct cannot be stated to be explicable only on the hypothesis of his guilt it is not certainly inconsistent with the hypothesis .....