Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Oswal Fats and Oils Vs. Commissioner of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2005)(187)ELT287TriDel

in rule 4 2 these exceptions are in expansion and explicatory of the special circumstances in section 14 1 it follows

The General Secretary, Karnataka Karya Niratha Pathrakarthara Sangha V ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2005KAR5414; 2005(6)KarLJ69; (2006)ILLJ513Kant

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the ..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

D. Shivanna Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2005(6)KarLJ83

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Income-tax Officer [Alongwith

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

..... that if upon analysis it was found that the greater part of the transaction is explicable only on fiscal grounds the mere presence of element of trading will not suffice to ..... ranking as such on the other hand if the greater part of the transaction is explicable only on fiscal grounds the mere presence of elements of trading will not suffice to .....

M. Babu Rao and ors. Vs. Deputy Registrar of Co-operative Societies/Of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(4)ALD582; 2005(4)ALT327; [2005]126CompCas708(AP); [2005]63SCL339(AP)

..... the federal constitutions of the united states of america and australia the enumerated federal powers explicity include the ancillary powers the u s constitution consecrates to the congress the power to ..... australia section 107 79 in contrast the canadian constitution the constitution act 1982 does not explicate ancillary power in the enumerated catalogue of powers of either the federal parliament or .....

Exxon Mobil Corp. Vs. Allapattah Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... as an indicator of legislative intent in congress committee reports are normally considered the authoritative explication of a statute s text and purposes and busy legislators and their assistants rely on ..... that explication in casting their votes cf garcia v united states 469 u s 70 76 1984 .....

Wallfort Shares and Stock Brokers Vs. Ito

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)96ITD1(Mum.)

..... that if upon analysis it was found that the greater part of the transaction is explicable only on fiscal grounds the mere presence of element of trading will not suffice to ..... ranking as such on the other hand if the greater part of the transaction is explicable only on fiscal grounds the mere presence of elements of trading will not suffice to .....

Leena J. Shah Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Ahmedabad

..... or indirectly connected with the assessee the object and purpose of sub section 2 as explicated from the speech of the finance minister was not to strike at honest and bona .....

N. Somi Reddy and anr. Vs. State of A.P. and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2005(2)ALD(Cri)406; 2005CriLJ3533

..... of the land is one such expression of the communities social values criminal procedures are explication of those procedures identified as fair procedures for administration of the criminal law of the .....

Mccreary County Vs. American Civil Liberties Union of Ky.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... if it has a sectarian heritage ante at 18 n 14 this inconsistency may be explicable in theory but i suspect that the objective observer with whom the court is so .....