Explicator - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Eicher Tractors Ltd., Haryana Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Mumbai

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2000(72)ECC673; 2000(122)ELT321(SC); 2000(7)SCALE483; 2001(1)LC361(SC)

sub rule 3 9 these exceptions are in expansion and explicatory of the special circumstances in section 14 1 quoted earlier

United States Vs. Mead Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s opinion have no antecedent in our jurisprudence chevron the case that the opinion purportedly explicates made no mention of the relatively formal administrative procedure s ante at 230 that the .....

G. Chinaswamy Naidu Vs. K. Padmanabhaiah

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2000(6)ALD92; 2000(5)ALT443

..... district to order transfer op no 410 of 1998 filed by the respondent herein is explicity stated by the learned district judge himself in paragraph 6 of the order which reads .....

Secure Meters Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jodhpur

..... so as to make the nicety of the issue involved in two distinct interpretations self explicable and to facilitate an easy understanding suppose the export profits are of rs 7 lakhs .....

Ashok Leyland Finance Ltd. Vs. Maruti Udyog Ltd. and anr.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2000(54)DRJ494

..... the view that the judgment on admission under order xii rule 6 cpc must be explic it the hon ble supreme court in chikkam koteswara rao vs chikkam subbarao ors air1971sc1542 .....

Adarsh Mahila Siksha Pratisthan and ors. Vs. the Calcutta Municipal Co ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)2CALLT47(HC)

..... enough for taking so much time for filing of the case there has been an explicable delay caused by the petitioners 14 it is true that there has been no straight .....

Mitchell Vs. Helms

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court began to employ neutrality in a sense different from equipoise however as it explicated the distinction between religious and secular benefits to religious schools the latter being in some .....

Hill Vs. Colorado

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the scene of the dispute id at 10l the court followed these observations with an explication of fundamental free speech principles i would have thought controlling in the present case it .....

Stenberg Vs. Carhart

Court: US Supreme Court

..... to the limit of my belief obviously irreconcilable with casey s explication of what its undueburden standard requires post at 983 but i ..... never put much stock in casey s explication of the inexplicable in the last analysis my judgment that casey ..... 877 today s decision is so obviously irreconcilable with casey s explication of what its undue burden standard requires let alone the .....

Dickerson Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1896 same moreover history and precedent aside the decision in miranda if read as an explication of what the constitution requires is preposterous there is for example simply no basis in .....