Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Fci Loading and Unloading Workers Union Vs. Food Corporation of India

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1986KAR2579

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

Murray Vs. Carrier

Court: US Supreme Court

..... claim footnote 8 ii in my opinion the cause and prejudice formula that the court explicates in such detail today is not dispositive when the fundamental fairness of a prisoner s ..... at 477 u s 496 or on the relationship of that standard to the principles explicated in united states v bagley 473 u s 667 1985 united states v agurs 427 .....

Aetna Life Ins. Co. Vs. Lavoie

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that justice embry s participation in this case violated appellant s due process rights as explicated in tumey murchison and ward we make clear that we are not required to decide .....

City of Los Angeles Vs. Heller

Court: US Supreme Court

..... there is a danger that it will issue an opinion without the careful deliberation and explication that the issues require today s per curiam opinion is a fair illustration of the .....

Dilip Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: 1987CriLJ212

..... credence though she had not complained of it to any one earlier this omission is explicable as according to the finding of the learned trial judge she had willingly eloped with .....

In Re: Indian Ferro Alloy

Court: Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission MRTPC

Reported in: (1987)62CompCas522NULL

..... its customers as a matter of fact the reply given by respondent no 6 is explicative of the price differential so against respondent no 6 this charge is not made out .....

income-tax Officer Vs. Manoj Kumar Chatterjee

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1987)21ITD19(Kol.)

..... of each case but the difficulty in matching them with the seeming irreconcilability are perhaps explicable only on the ground that the determination in any particular case is dependent on the .....

Digvijay Cement Company Limited Vs. Union of India

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: 1986(10)ECC359; 1987(10)LC7(Gujarat); 1986(25)ELT879(Guj); (1987)1GLR641

..... inserted on 28 12 1968 thereby what was implicit between 1963 and 1968 was made explicity by the rule making authority thus by inserting sub para i to the proviso no ..... inserted on 28 12 1968 thereby what was implicit between 1963 and 1968 was made explicity by the rule making authority further requirements of the proviso to clauses a or b .....