Skip to content

Did you mean: explanation?


Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: explicator Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.002 seconds)
Feb 21 2002 (HC)

Dharmarajan Vs. State

Court: Kerala

Decided on: Feb-21-2002

Reported in: 2002CriLJ2571

of s 162 criminal procedure code though wide is not explicitor specific enough to extend the prohibition to the use of

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 10 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Dadha Plantations (P) Ltd.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jul-10-2002

Reported in: (2002)177CTR(Mad)138

..... ac has held that having regard to the provision of section 40a 8 read with explication b to the said section the income tax officer was justified in disallowing the interest .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 16 2002 (HC)

National Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prema and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Apr-16-2002

Reported in: 2002ACJ1889; [2002]110CompCas31(Kar)

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 21 2002 (HC)

Most. Nirmala Devi and ors. Vs. Virendra Kumar Tripathi and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jan-21-2002

..... welfare and about the studies of her sons the contents of these letters will therefore explicity indicate that virendra kumar tripathi was having kinship with nirmala devi and her sons admittedly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 2002 (FN)

Carey Vs. Saffold

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-27-2002

..... but the tolling provision seeks to protect the state s interests and the state can explicate timing requirements more precisely should that prove necessary in applying a federal statute that interacts .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 24 2002 (HC)

Satya Narayan Bind and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: May-24-2002

..... this argument was meritless for the simple reason that the complicity of the appellants had explicity transpired in the fardbeyan of jonihia devi p w 2 and narration made by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 30 2002 (HC)

Arjun Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar

Court: Patna

Decided on: Sep-30-2002

..... the indian evidence act that oral evidence must in all cases whatever be direct it explicity provides that if an evidence refers to a fact which could be seen it must .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 2002 (HC)

Manpyare and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jan-03-2002

Reported in: 2002CriLJ3046; 2002(1)MPHT253; 2002(2)MPLJ11

..... credence though she had not complained of it to any one earlier this omission is explicable as according to the finding of the learned trial judge she had willingly eloped with .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.
  • Next >>

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //