Explicator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicator Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 8 results (0.002 seconds)Dharmarajan Vs. State
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Feb-21-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2571
of s 162 criminal procedure code though wide is not explicitor specific enough to extend the prohibition to the use of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCit Vs. Dadha Plantations (P) Ltd.
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jul-10-2002
Reported in: (2002)177CTR(Mad)138
..... ac has held that having regard to the provision of section 40a 8 read with explication b to the said section the income tax officer was justified in disallowing the interest .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Prema and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-16-2002
Reported in: 2002ACJ1889; [2002]110CompCas31(Kar)
..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMost. Nirmala Devi and ors. Vs. Virendra Kumar Tripathi and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: Jan-21-2002
..... welfare and about the studies of her sons the contents of these letters will therefore explicity indicate that virendra kumar tripathi was having kinship with nirmala devi and her sons admittedly .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCarey Vs. Saffold
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-27-2002
..... but the tolling provision seeks to protect the state s interests and the state can explicate timing requirements more precisely should that prove necessary in applying a federal statute that interacts .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatya Narayan Bind and ors. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
Decided on: May-24-2002
..... this argument was meritless for the simple reason that the complicity of the appellants had explicity transpired in the fardbeyan of jonihia devi p w 2 and narration made by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTArjun Mahto Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-30-2002
..... the indian evidence act that oral evidence must in all cases whatever be direct it explicity provides that if an evidence refers to a fact which could be seen it must .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTManpyare and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Decided on: Jan-03-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ3046; 2002(1)MPHT253; 2002(2)MPLJ11
..... credence though she had not complained of it to any one earlier this omission is explicable as according to the finding of the learned trial judge she had willingly eloped with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial