Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Eeoc Vs. Shell Oil Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1601 12 a 3 676 f 2d at 325 to assess that conclusion we must explicate the crucial portion of the regulation as applied to a charge alleging a pattern or ..... employers fair notice of the existence and nature of the charges against them finally in explicating the notice requirement we must keep in view the more general objectives of title vii .....

Minnesota Vs. Murphy

Court: US Supreme Court

..... substantial opportunity for research and reflection the lawyers who represent the nation err in their explication of the relevant constitutional principles murphy surely cannot be charged with knowledge of his entitlements ..... then carefully instruct their clients on the nuances of those rights as we have now explicated them footnote 2 30 armed with this knowledge few probationers will succumb to the .....

Kosak Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of the major figures in the development of the tort claims act in his report explicating his proposals judge holtzoff explained the proposed provision would exempt from the coverage of the .....

icc Vs. American Trucking Assns., Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in h r rep no 96 1069 pp 29 30 1980 footnote 2 the commission explicated its proposed remedy in orders issued on january 28 1981 see record 375 381 motor .....

Allen Vs. Wright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... education alleged by the respondents in these cases constitutes distinct and palpable injury b fully explicating the injury alleged helps to explain why it is fairly traceable to the governmental conduct .....

Westinghouse Elec. Corp. Vs. Tully

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for such controversy and confusion in the present litigation the lessons of that case as explicated further in maryland v louisiana 451 u s 725 1981 are controlling in both maryland .....

Heckler Vs. Edwards

Court: US Supreme Court

..... review of the holding that a statute was unconstitutional the bill s sponsor representative sumners explicated the section to mean that the government may appeal directly to the supreme court in .....

South Carolina Vs. Regan

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 435 u s 444 435 u s 461 1978 footnote 3 10 perhaps the plainest explication of this court s position on state tax immunity is found in new york v .....

Abdul Jabbar and ors. Vs. Jumankhan S/O. Mohamed Hassan Khan

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1985(2)BomCR74

..... middle of the upper portion and not immediately after the bill number is really quite explicable these numbers are not printed numbers they are put by rubber stamps subsequently really speaking .....

Prabhu Premlata Gurpur Vs. Prabhu Subraya Gurpur

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1984(2)BomCR686

..... ex parte decree was passed and so far as ex parte decree was concerned there was some explicable reason for the learned advocate to remain absent in the first place his office had .....