Explicator - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: explicator Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 9 results (0.003 seconds)Asarco Inc. Vs. Idaho State Tax Comm'n
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-1982
..... at 445 u s 438 emphasis added page 458 u s 317 the mobil court explicated the limiting unitary business principle by observing that geographic accounting in purporting to isolate income .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJacksonville Bulk Terminals Vs. Longshoremen
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-24-1982
..... since it reduces the amount of available work footnote 2 2 thus the cases generally explicating the meaning of 13 c lend no support to the notion that this case involves .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTinwood Laboratories Vs. Ives Laboratories
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-01-1982
..... finding of functionality may also be relevant to an action involving 32 it does not explicate the relationship of functionality in a 32 case it is my view that a finding .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Bank of India Vs. Quality Bread Factory and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Dec-08-1982
Reported in: AIR1983P& H244
..... north western bank ltd v joyn poynter and son macdonalds 1895 ac 56 it was explicity recognised that a pledgee may redeliver goods to the pledgor for a limited purpose without .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPramod Kumar Mittal Vs. Andhra Steel Corporation Ltd. and ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Jun-02-1982
Reported in: [1985]58CompCas772(Cal)
..... of these provisions it seems to me to make no difference that it is not explicity stated in the indian statutes as in order 58 supreme court rules that an appeal .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLongshoremen Vs. Allied Int'l, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1982
..... id at 1372 in these circumstances the clear language of the statute needs no further explication b the secondary boycott provisions in 8 b 4 b prohibit a union from inducing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLachhman Dass Deceased and ors. Vs. Veer Finance Company and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-26-1982
Reported in: AIR1983Delhi397; 23(1983)DLT231; 1983RLR109
..... exclude the latter sense of the words notice and service it would have said so explicity it has not done so here moreover to construe the expression as meaning only a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMadhusudan Das Vs. Smt. Narayanibai (Deceased) by Lrs. and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Nov-25-1982
Reported in: AIR1983SC114; 1983MhLJ402(SC); 1982(2)SCALE1083; (1983)1SCC35; [1983]1SCR851; 1983(15)LC25(SC)
..... notices published in the newspapers disclaiming execution of the adoption deed and the adoption are explicable only in the context of the overpowering influence of narsinghdas so also is the creation ..... notices published in the newspapers disclaiming execution of the adoption deed and the adoption are explicable only in the context of the overpowering influence of narsinghdas
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTH.S. Chauhan and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Jul-06-1982
Reported in: 1982WLN321
..... which it opens that it is intended to apply to transferred employees only it declares explicity that the central government is satisfied that a revision of the terms and conditions of ..... interests of the corporation and its policy holders require such reduction or revision it declares explicity that the central government is satisfied that a revision of the terms and conditions of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial