Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Narayan Hari Shanker Vs. State of Rajasthan and 5 ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 1977WLN430

..... regulated markets for purchase and sale of agricultural produce to protect the agriculturists from being explicated by the middle men and profiteers to enable them to secure a fair return for .....

Kunta Malla Reddy Vs. Soma Srinivas Reddy and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1978AP289

..... its discretion to enforce it 16 proceeding further the learned judge explicated the inherent content of the concept of discretion contemplated by s ..... refusing to grant stay under s 34 of the act was explicated by justice gajendragadkar as he then was in printers mysore private ..... the expression other steps in the proceedings in s 34 was explicated by a division bench of the high court of allahabad in .....

Ward Vs. Illinois

Court: US Supreme Court

..... within the examples of the kinds of sexually explicit representations that miller used to explicate the aspect of its obscenity definition dealing with patently offensive depictions of specifically ..... within the examples of the kinds of sexually explicit representations that miller used to explicate the aspect of its obscenity definition dealing with patently offensive depictions of specifically .....

Jeffers Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the question whether 846 is a lesser included offense of 848 finally it requires further explication of the court s decision in iannelli v united states 420 u s 770 1975 .....

Bengal National Chamber of Commerce and Industry Vs. Commissioner of I ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: [1978]111ITR514(Cal)

..... section 2 page 677 4 23 the finance minister in his speech in the house explicated the reason for the restrictive condition he said the definition of charitable purpose in that .....

Zacchini Vs. Scripps-howard Broadcasting Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... chewing gum inc 202 f 2d 866 868 ca2 1953 footnote 5 the court s explication was as follows the proper standard must necessarily be whether the matters reported were of .....

Connor Vs. Finch

Court: US Supreme Court

..... neutral guidelines can lead as they did here to a charge that the departures are explicable only in terms of a purpose to minimize the voting strength of a minority group .....

Moore Vs. City of East Cleveland

Court: US Supreme Court

..... postponement of precious first amendment rights was a concomitant of the available administrative procedure similarly explicable are those cases in which challenge is made to the constitutionality of the administrative proceedings .....

Smith Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... serves a dual communicative function it conveys not only ideas capable of relatively precise detached explication but otherwise inexpressible emotions as well in fact words are often chosen as much for .....

United Jewish Organizations Vs. Carey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... assume that the 1974 reapportionment was undertaken in compliance with the voting rights act as explicated in beer the opinion states in the absence of any evidence regarding nonwhite voting strength .....