Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Shanthinath Vs. Deputy Commissioner and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2008KAR5154

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

Girias Investment Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Karnataka and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT2008(4)SC242; 2008(5)KarLJ1; 2008(4)SCALE498; [2008]7SCR53; 2008AIRSCW3711; 2008(7)SCC53; 2008(2)LH(SC)1316; 2008(5)KLJ1; 2008(4)AIRKarR326

..... the airport authority had emphatically denied the need for a change and it was in explicable as to what had prompted a reversal of the decision a few days later mr .....

Indian Bank Vs. Commercial Tax Officer and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2008)18VST562(Mad)

..... bank case 2001 247itr165 sc a case is a precedent and binding for what it explicity decides and no more in u p state electricity board v pooran chandra pandey air .....

Sprint Communications Co. Vs. Apcc Services, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... beneficial interest in the bond and endorsing pomeroy s rule as a clear and correct explication of the law 10 young v hudson 99 mo 102 106 12 s w 632 .....

United States Vs. Williams

Court: US Supreme Court

..... v virginia citizens consumer council inc 425 u s 748 1976 still the case s explication of the meaning of pandering is instructive united states v williams 06 694 2008 souter .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Walfort Share and Stock Brokers (P) Ltd ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2008)219CTR(Bom)409; [2009]310ITR421(Bom)

..... tax cas 580 hl mr srivastav submitted that if greater part of a transaction is explicable only on fiscal grounds the mere presence of an element of trading will not be .....

Ncr Corporation India Pvt. Ltd., a Company Registered Under the Compan ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (2009)22VST371(Karn); 2009(2)KCCRSN62; 2009(4)AIRKarR436

..... buyer in satisfaction of his contract of purchase and such a nexus is otherwise in explicable then the sale or purchase of the specific or ascertained goods ought to be deemed .....

Ghurey Lal Vs. State of U.P.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)605; 2008(56)BLJR2559; JT2008(10)SC324; 2008(10)SCALE616; (2008)10SCC450; 2008(2)LC991(SC); 2008AIRSCW6598; 2008(3)Crimes383; 2008(4)LH(SC)2817

..... very substantial and compelling reasons 48 in tulsiram kanu v the state air1954sc1 this court explicated that the appellate court would be justified in reversing the acquittal only when very substantial .....

State of Punjab Vs. Prem Sagar and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2008(2)ALD(Cri)415; 2008CriLJ3533; JT2008(7)SC66; 2008AIRSCW4805; 2008(7)SCC550; (2008)3SCC(Cri)183; 2008CriLJ3533; 2008(3)Crimes35; 2008(3)AICLR546; 2008(4)Supreme508; 2008(4)LH(SC)2630

..... economic social or educational deprivation prior to the offense was the defendant s criminal behavior explicable in part by youth inexperience or an unformed ability to resist peer pressure most guideline .....

Maqbool Fida HusaIn Vs. Raj Kumar Pandey

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2008CriLJ4107

..... 82 it was argued that place of the motherland is above heaven which has been explicated by way of a sanskrit shloka i e janani janam bhumisch swargadapi gariasi the values .....