Explicator - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Millipore (India) Private Limited, Bangalore Vs. Union of India a ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 1999LC465(Karnataka); 1999(113)ELT62(Kar); 1999(5)KarLJ51

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

United States Vs. Haggar Apparel Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... justice ginsburg joins concurring in part and dissenting in part like the statutory provision it explicates the customs service regulation at issue begins with a generally applicable standard for a duty .....

Carmell Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... length the attainder of fenwick which served as a cautionary model for justice chase s explication of the fourth category in calder see ante at 526 530 14 this excursion into .....

West Covina Vs. Perkins

Court: US Supreme Court

..... s place to specify the exact phrasing of an adequate notice the court proceeded to explicate in some detail the content of the required notice in cases where property is taken .....

Berlia Chemicals and Traders (P) Ltd. Vs. Asstt. Cit

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (2002)76TTJ(Mumbai)974

..... been duly considered it would be appropriate if we first deal with the effect of explication 4a inserted in section 43 1 of the act with effect from 1 10 1996 .....

Gujarat State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Workmen of State Transpor ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1999)IILLJ1363Guj

..... mouth of the central government for it is an all too familiar argument with the explicating class and a welfare state committed to be socialist pattern of society cannot be permitted .....

A.K. Raju Moopan Vs. Packiam Ammal

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)3MLJ713

..... attendant circumstances could be looked into only to gather the intention such an intention if explicity expressed in the document itself there is no scope for looking at the attendant circumstances .....

K. Radhakrishnan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

..... 1 3 1986 when the date of the applicability of the particular office memorandum is explicity it cannot be understood otherwise as giving retrospective effect to the earlier seniority fixed there .....

Sahara India Savings and Investment Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Allahabad

..... sub clause i c sub clause i either to in section 2 7 existed to explicity exclude the interest on government securities and debentures the deletion of this exclusion does not .....

Mitchell Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... those rights are gone app 45 neither the rule itself nor the district court s explication of it indicates that the defendant consents to take the stand in the sentencing phase .....