Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Keyes Vs. School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... policy page 413 u s 207 and that the acts of which petitioners complain are explicable within the bounds of that policy accepting the school board s explanation the district court ..... 437 438 the drastic extension of brown which green represented was barely if at all explicated in the latter opinion to require that a genuinely dual system be disestablished in the .....

Colgrove Vs. Battin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the court s treatment of this statutory requirement is to say the least peculiar when explicating the seventh amendment my brethren hold that the framers intended to govern only the types ..... page 413 u s 185 congress addition of the phrase as at common law is explicable only if the legislature also intended to protect jury characteristics from change my brethren chose .....

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... the debates attending the legislative process he asked the question on what basis is it explicable that lawyers can regard with equanimity cases in which judges may pronounce ex cathedra that ..... serious attention another aspect of american decisions which has relevance in this matter is the explication of the concept of amendment in cases like livermore s california 1894 mccleary s indiana .....

Bland Vs. U.S.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... community page 412 u s 909 911 the substantial difficulties are obviously the constitutional rights explicated in kent and in gault the better mechanism is the use of the short cut .....

McClanahan Vs. Arizona State Tax Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... similarly narrower statutes authorizing states to assert tax jurisdiction over reservations in special situations are explicable only if congress assumed that the states lacked the power to impose the taxes without .....

Sloan Vs. Lemon

Court: US Supreme Court

..... district court on april 6 1972 the panel denied the motion in a full opinion explicating its views and holding that the law violated the establishment clause 340 f supp 1356 .....

United States Vs. Russell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... intolerable degree of governmental participation in the criminal enterprise held the entrapment defense which as explicated in sorrells v united states 287 u s 435 and sherman v united states 356 .....

United States Vs. Falstaff Brewing Corp.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 54 in 1964 to 61 3 in 1965 in large part these figures are probably explicable in terms of the nationwide trend in favor of the large national and regional brewers .....

Department of Motor Vehicles Vs. Rios

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cline v credit bureau of santa clara valley 1970 1 cal 3d 908 the rule explicated in foregoing cases is applicable to the instant circumstances 7 cal 3d 792 795 499 .....

Torres Vs. New York State Dept of Labor

Court: US Supreme Court

..... were to be sharply limited the court would at least have found it necessary to explicate the basis for this limitation and delineate the new reach of those decisions instead the .....