Explicator - Judgment Search Results

Sri Chunchaiah Since Dead by Lrs. Vs. Union Bank of India and anr.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1997KAR1535; 1997(3)KarLJ298

..... makes it clear that 58 years is prescribed as the age of superannuation it is explicity made clear that no employee shall have any claim for continuing in service beyond the .....

M. Hasan and anr. Vs. Government of Andhra Pradesh and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1998AP35; 1997(6)ALT209

..... more favoured position in the community than is accorded to other citizens he enjoys an explicity defined independence because it is the only condition under which he can fulfill his role .....

Brij Bhal Singh Gautam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1998All132

..... nav bharat enterprises p ltd 1996 3 scc 443 the expression cause of action was explicated as under it is settled law that cause of action consists of bundle of facts .....

Washington Vs. Glucksberg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... plurality opinion opinion for four justices treating justice harlan s poe dissent as a central explication of the methodology of judicial review under the due process clause 757 peating magna carta .....

Centre for Social Justice Vs. Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1998)1GLR656

..... the premises are let so the statutory provision incorporated in section 132 1 b i explicity and manifestly indicates that even if the premises are let the primary liability for payment .....

Mrs. Dr. Tapati Sengupta and Ms. Amgana Sengupta Vs. Enforcement Offic ...

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 1998(60)ECC48

..... if without more the answer establishes quit does it amount to confession an illustration will explicate our proposition 30 the apex court referring to a decision in hoffman v united states .....

Sayed Osman S/O Sayed Karim and Others Vs. the State of Maharashtra

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(5)BomCR127

..... must be convinced that what it concludes must necessarily have happened and is not reasonable explicable in any other way if we consider the evidence on record from this angle we ..... must be convinced that what it concludes must necessarily have happened and is not reasonable explicable in any other way the appellate court however look for errors of probative appraisal over .....