Equalize - Judgment Search Results

Delstar Commercial and Financial Vs. Sarvottam Vinijaya Ltd. and ors.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2003)113CompCas642

..... sought in the petitions the company law board cannot declare equal ownership and joint management in these companies and order ..... declaration that the shareholding in these nine respondent companies is equal is fully justified even otherwise he contended that there should ..... suit filed in the calcutta high court according to which equality and joint management have been thoroughly established in this .....

Pandian Roadways Corporation Ltd. Vs. Principal Labour Court and ors.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)ILLJ111Mad

..... work there may be qualitative difference as regards reliability and responsibility the concept of equal pay for equal work is contained in article 39 d of the constitution a directive principle and ..... objects sought to be achieved the classification must be upheld principle of equal pay for equal work as applicable among equals it cannot be applied to unequals relief to an aggrieved person seeking .....

Smt. Pushpa Kochar and ors. Vs. the Rajasthan High Court and ors.

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: 2001(3)WLC269; 2002(3)WLN174

..... or lower the controversy was unanimously answered without much difficulty against promotees being placed equals to non promotees for consideration of promotion to rhjs as per seniority as munsifs ..... is closely interlinked with the promotional rule based on fundamental right to be offered equality of opportunity in the matter of employments which includes appointment by promotion and seniority .....

Board of Trustees of Univ. of AlA. Vs. Garrett

Court: US Supreme Court

..... inaccessible public transportation 00506 adult victims of abuse with developmental disabilities denied equal rights to testify in court 00507 inaccessible public recreation activities 00508 inaccessible ..... state employee threatened with discipline for serving on and attending meetings of equal employment opportunity commission advisory committee 00925 state university stadium lacked accessible .....

Deepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers (P.) Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... and agency for elevators the understanding further provided both the groups will have equal shareholding and also equal representation on the board of these two companies accordingly the respondent company was ..... group holding 2400 shares thus this allotment has straightway converted the petitioner from an equal shareholder to a minority and a new majority has been created this allotment is .....

Ravi Shankar Taneja Vs. Motherson Triplex Tools (P.) Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... view of the shareholding being 49 51 the term proportionate has to be construed as equal while shri ramachandran negatives this suggestion shri ramachandran contends that since the shareholding is not ..... the petitioner 5 directors even though shri ramachandran vehemently contended that proportion does not mean equal this argument has no relevance when we examine the appointment of shri srinivasan as a .....

S. Ajit Singh Vs. Dss Enterprises (P.) Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

..... to the submission of the petitioners that the shareholding of the respondent company was held equally between the family of the petitioners and the respondents the learned counsel has contended ..... nature of the company in such family companies any disturbance in the long held shareholding equal participation in the management and admission of non family members as shareholders directors would merit .....

Deepak Lohia Vs. Kamrup Developers Private

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2003)116CompCas188

..... and agency for elevators the understanding further provided both the groups will have equal shareholding and also equal representation on the board of these two companies accordingly the respondent company was ..... the fact that as per the agreement between the parties there was to be equality according to the respondents the understanding was that the respondents would have majority neither .....

United States Vs. Hatter

Court: US Supreme Court

..... for the statutory distinction between judges and other high level federal employees i e equalizing the financial burdens imposed by the noncontributory judicial retirement system and the contributory system ..... to which the other employees belonged is unsound because such equalization takes place not by offering all current federal employees including judges the same .....

Pga Tour, Inc. Vs. Martin

Court: US Supreme Court

..... which the legislative history indicates should be construed liberally to afford people with disabilities equal access to the wide variety of establishments available to the nondisabled given the ..... golf courses then petitioner must not discriminate against any individual in the full and equal enjoyment of the goods services facilities privileges advantages or accommodations of those courses ibid .....