Equalize - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: equalize Year: 1971 Page 1 of about 821 results (0.018 seconds)GriffIn Vs. Breckenridge
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1971
..... s 100 the language requiring intent to deprive of equal protection or equal privileges and immunities means that there must be some ..... footnote 3 and judicial thinking about what can constitute an equal protection deprivation has because of the amendment s wording focused ..... support the requisite animus to deprive the petitioners of the equal enjoyment of legal rights because of their race the claims .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPalmer Vs. Thompson
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1971
..... the fourteenth amendment and the two escorting amendments establish a principle of absolute equality an equality which is denied by racial separation or segregation because the separation in ..... position in that litigation that the segregation of recreational facilities if separate but equal recreational facilities were provided and if citizens voluntarily used segregated facilities was constitutional .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSchilb Vs. Kuebel
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-20-1971
..... that a statutory classification based upon suspect criteria or affecting fundamental rights will encounter equal protection difficulties unless justified by a compelling governmental interest shapiro v thompson 394 ..... costs on only one class of those persons seeking pretrial release violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment accordingly i would reverse the judgment before .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWhitcomb Vs. Chavis
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1971
..... effective participation by all citizens in state government requires therefore that each citizen have an equally effective voice in the election of members of his state legislature ibid hence apportionment ..... that the difficulty of devising compact and contiguous districts within that framework of mathematical equality has in large part precluded preservation of county lines id at 1366 we note .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLabine Vs. Vincent
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-29-1971
..... whose fathers have publicly acknowledged them differently from legitimate children plainly violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment the court today effectively concedes this and ..... publicly acknowledged illegitimate child differently from a legitimate child was a denial of equal protection and due process the louisiana intermediate appellate court affirmed in all respects .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPicard Vs. Connor
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-20-1971
..... before it the massachusetts supreme judicial court had a fair opportunity to consider the equal protection claim and to correct that asserted constitutional defect in respondent s conviction we ..... that there are no available state judicial remedies through which he can present the equal protection claim it appears that massachusetts provides post conviction procedures adequate to adjudicate that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoddie Vs. Connecticut
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-02-1971
..... before a writ of habeas corpus could be considered in state court was invalid under the equal protection clause here connecticut has provided requirements for married couples to obtain divorces and because ..... constitution itself provide what is governmentally fair and what is not neither due process nor equal protection permits state laws to be invalidated on any such nonconstitutional standard as a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbate Vs. Mundt
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-07-1971
..... t oleration of even small deviations detracts from the constitutional command of equal representation for equal numbers of people only those limited population variances which are unavoidable despite ..... this court has carefully scrutinized state interests offered to justify deviations from population equality in assessing the constitutionality of various apportionment plans we have observed that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGraham Vs. Department of Pub. Welfare
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1971
..... of amounts allegedly due she claimed that arizona s alien residency requirements violate the equal protection clause and the constitutional right to travel that they conflict with the social ..... general assistance but resident aliens as a class are precluded from that assistance under traditional equal protection principles a state retains broad discretion to classify as long as its classification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKhummaji Milapchand and Co. and anr. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-10-1971
Reported in: [1973]91ITR333(AP)
..... provisions of hindu law became entitled to share the property left by their father in equal proportions it has been specifically agreed in the instruments of partnership that the amounts standing ..... partnership which establishes that there was an internal arrangement between the minors to share in equal proportions the profits allotted to them for their collective share from the mere fact that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial