Equalize - Judgment Search Results

Kesavananda Bharati Sripadagalvaru and ors.Vs. State of Kerala and anr ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1973SC1461; (1973)4SCC225; [1973]SuppSCR1

..... its rise originates or derives the word adequate according to the same dictionary means equal in magnitude or extent commensurate in fitness sufficient suitable according to the words and phrases ..... and to secure to all its citizens justice social economic and political liberty and equality fundamental rights which are conferred and guaranteed by part iii of the constitution undoubtedly constitute .....

San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. Rodriguez

Court: US Supreme Court

..... were an unconstitutional method of providing for education then it might be an equally impermissible means of providing other necessary services customarily financed largely from local ..... reapportionment is yet another alternative which would accomplish directly essentially what district power equalization would seek to do artificially appellants claim that the calculations concerning state property .....

Gaffney Vs. Cummings

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the fourteenth amendment was not made out iii state legislative districts may be equal or substantially equal in population and still be vulnerable under the fourteenth amendment a districting ..... considerations incident to the effectuation of a rational state policy some deviations from the equal population principle are constitutionally permissible with respect to the apportionment of seats in .....

White Vs. Regester

Court: US Supreme Court

..... demands that the state make a good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical equality equal representation for equal numbers of people is a principle designed to prevent debasement of voting ..... court held that the house plan state wide contained constitutionally impermissible deviations from population equality and that the multi member districts provided for bexar and dallas counties invidiously .....

Mahan Vs. Howell

Court: US Supreme Court

..... minimis and to satisfy without question the as nearly as practicable standard since equal representation for equal numbers of people is the fundamental goal for the house of representatives wesberry ..... in so doing it suggested that in the implementation of the basic constitutional principle equality of population among the districts more flexibility was constitutionally permissible with respect to .....

Bonelli Cattle Co. Vs. Arizona

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the arizona supreme court reversed footnote 4 holding that under the equal footing doctrine and the submerged lands act arizona holds title ..... of the court s analysis is completely to undercut the equal footing doctrine as noted above the original states derived their ..... conflict with the purpose it was intended to serve if the equal footing doctrine means anything it means that arizona cannot be .....

Keyes Vs. School Dist. No. 1

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and constitutionally acceptable program the only program which furnishes anything approaching substantial equality is a system of desegregation and integration which provides compensatory education in ..... taken appropriate steps to i integrate faculties and administration ii scrupulously assure equality of facilities instruction and curriculum opportunities throughout the district iii utilize their .....

Salyer Land Co. Vs. Tulare Water Dist.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cases in which the court has had occasion to consider the limits imposed by the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment on legislation apportioning representation in state and local ..... should be charged with responsibility for its operation we conclude therefore that nothing in the equal protection clause precluded california from limiting the voting for directors of appellee district by .....

Gaffney Vs. Cummings

Court: US Supreme Court

..... demands that the state make a good faith effort to achieve precise mathematical equality equal representation for equal numbers of people is a principle designed to prevent debasement of voting ..... than that amount require no justification whatsoever ii the proposition that certain deviations from equality of district population are so small as to lack constitutional significance while repeatedly .....

Lehnhausen Vs. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and similar entities but not individuals to ad valorem taxes on personalty comports with equal protection requirements the states being accorded wide latitude in making classifications and drawing lines ..... and nonindividuals subject to the personal property tax claiming that the tax violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment since it exempts from personal property taxes all .....