Equalize - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: equalize Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.016 seconds)Plyler Vs. Doe
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-15-1982
..... substantive constitutional rights necessarily will be invalid if not by force of the equal protection clause then through operation of other provisions of the constitution conversely classifications ..... these may be factors unrelated to individual choice or to any wrongdoing the equal protection clause protects against arbitrary and irrational classifications and against invidious discrimination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTClements Vs. Fashing
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1982
..... situated people differently legislatures are ordinarily assumed to have acted constitutionally under traditional equal protection principles distinctions need only be drawn in such a manner as to ..... offices are classified according to the district court the classification system cannot survive equal protection scrutiny because texas has failed to explain sufficiently why some elected public .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRogers Vs. Lodge
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1982
..... possibly satisfy the requirement of impartial administration of the law that is embodied in the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment the facts of this case illustrate the ephemeral ..... covert employment of a principle of selection that could not constitutionally be employed overtly is equally unconstitutional however where what is decried is something to which the complainant has a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZobel Vs. Williams
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-14-1982
..... while some imprecision is unavoidable in the process of legislative classification the ideal of equal protection requires attention to individual merit to individual need in almost all instances ..... the rarest of circumstances when local economic regulation is challenged solely as violating the equal protection clause this court consistently defers to legislative determinations as to the desirability .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTToll Vs. Moreno
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1982
..... created have been judged relevant by the legislators responsible for the enactment the equal protection clause however reflects the judgment of its framers that some distinguishing characteristics ..... were this consideration conclusive all state classifications would be considered suspect under the equal protection clause because every classification is relevant to some purposes and irrelevant to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBoard of Educ. Vs. Rowley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-1982
..... ability to assimilate information presented in the classroom the requirement that states provide equal educational opportunities would thus seem to present an entirely unworkable standard requiring impossible ..... fortiori the defendants conduct here denying plaintiffs and their class not just an equal publicly supported education but all publicly supported education while providing such education to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth Haven Bd. of Educ. Vs. Bell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-17-1982
..... title vii of the 1964 civil rights act to educational institutions and extend the equal pay for equal work act to include executive administrative and professional women 118 cong rec 5803 ..... discrimination in federally funded education programs while the provisions involving title vii and the equal pay act are summarized under the heading b prohibition of education related employment discrimination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCrawford Vs. Los Angeles Board of Educ.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
..... that distortions of the political process have special implications for attempts to achieve equal protection of the laws thus the court has found particularly pernicious those classifications ..... fourteenth amendment may nonetheless create a discriminatory reallocation of governmental power that does violate equal protection the fact that some less effective avenues remain open to those interested .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMississippi Univ. for Women Vs. Hogan
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1982
..... is anomalous and ultimately the anomaly reveals legal error that of applying a heightened equal protection standard developed in cases of genuine sexual stereotyping to a narrowly utilized state ..... my view the court errs seriously by assuming without argument or discussion that the equal protection standard generally applicable to sex discrimination is appropriate here that standard was designed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWashington Vs. Seattle Sch. Dist. No. 1
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-30-1982
..... state in federal district court challenging the constitutionality of initiative 350 under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment the district court held the initiative unconstitutional ..... the western district of washington challenging the constitutionality of initiative 350 under the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment the united states and several community .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial