Equalize - Judgment Search Results

State Board of Equalization Vs. Young's Market Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... beer and 750 per annum for the privilege of manufacturing beer held consistent with the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment first because a classification recognized by the twenty ..... generalization second the claim that the statutory provisions and the regulations are void under the equal protection clause may be briefly disposed of a classification recognized by the twenty first .....

Matson Navigation Co. Vs. State Board of Equalization

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on that basis he assessed an additional tax the state board of equalization sustained the additional assessment the case was taken on writ of ..... s determination 22 2 was not disturbed by the board of equalization or the supreme court and appellants do not in this court ..... the differences portrayed in the argument of appellants do not deny them equal protection of the laws the measure of the tax is the .....

British-american Oil Producing Co. Vs. Board of Equalization

Court: US Supreme Court

..... confined to lands acquired by indians through the payment of a consideration in money but equally including lands reserved for indians in return for a cession or surrender by them of ..... u s 159 1936 british american oil producing co v board of equalization of montana no 37 argued november 11 1936 decided december 7 1936 299 u s .....

Sailendra Krishna Choudhury Vs. Harendra Kumar Roy and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 167Ind.Cas.430

parties were given separate allotment of immovable properties and to equalise the partition defendants nos 11 ka to 11 ga became

Sailendra Krishna Choudhury Vs. Harendra Kumar Boy and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR1937Cal4

parties were given separate allotment of immoveable properties and to equalise the partition defendants 11 ka to 11 ga became entitled

Annayya Janakirama Bhagavathar and anr. Vs. Annayya Narasimha Bhagavat ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 169Ind.Cas.340

venkataramana rao j 1 this second appeal raises a question of limitation the suit is one for an account of...

Dodla Rami Reddi and ors. Vs. Devireddi Pattabhirami Reddi

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR1937Mad124; 169Ind.Cas.12

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

In Re: M. Subbaiah thevar Avl.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.973

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Sait Balakishan Lal Hanuman Prasad Firm, Marwadi and Co. Vs. Mandala V ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 164Ind.Cas.1064

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

United States Trust Co. Vs. Commissioner

Court: US Supreme Court

..... were accordingly transferred on the books of the trustee in equal shares to three new accounts one for each of the ..... of the grantor acquisitions of additional principal by purchase were divided equally among the three trusts the stock certificates acquired by the ..... of the single trust was closed and the items were transferred equally to separate accounts in the names of the beneficiaries showing .....