Equalize - Judgment Search Results

Miller Vs. Albright

Court: US Supreme Court

..... discrimination accords a basis for standing only to those persons who are personally denied equal treatment by the challenged discriminatory conduct internal quotation marks omitted moreover the grant of ..... prevailing not specially lenient standards of review must apply iv if we apply undiluted equal protection standards we must hold the two statutory provisions at issue unconstitutional the statutes .....

Lunding Vs. New York Tax Appeals Tribunal

Court: US Supreme Court

..... no serious argument that petitioners alimony deductions were legitimate business expenses the approximate equality of tax treatment required by the constitution was satisfied this court s precedent ..... 6 discriminates against new york nonresidents in violation of the privileges and immunities equal protection and commerce clauses of the federal constitution after unsuccessful administrative appeals in .....

Campbell Vs. Louisiana

Court: US Supreme Court

..... upon consideration of these factors we concluded a white defendant had standing to bring an equal protection challenge to racial discrimination against black persons in the petit jury selection process ..... remaining seats on the grand jury finally there are ample opportunities for prospective jurors whose equal protection rights have been violated to vindicate those rights rather than relying upon a .....

Chennai Textile Chemicals Private Ltd. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and anr ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2002]125STC107(Mad)

..... it is found that it is violative of the equality clause equal protection clause enshrined therein similarly if an enactment is ..... between persons who are similarly placed a law providing for equal treatment of unequal objects transactions or persons would be ..... for the adjudicatory machinery under the sea customs act holds equally true for the administrative or adjudicatory machinery designed to .....

i.T.C. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1998)(62)ECC591

..... unconnected with the price structure the burden of duty would fall equally on cheaper cigarettes and more expensive cigarettes in fact the ..... retailers can be effectively prevented from selling the packages at prices equal to or less than the declared printed prices and that ..... adopted was estimated ep multiplied by estimated sales would be equal to consumer spending k ramanath n k mukherjee a dutt .....

Minnesota Vs. Mille Lacs Band of Chippewa Indians

Court: US Supreme Court

..... is this conclusion the conclusion undergirding the race horse court s equal footing holding that we have consistently rejected over the years ..... of indian treatybased usufructuary rights klamath did not involve the equal footing doctrine rather we cited race horse for the second ..... by the admission of minnesota to the union on an equal footing in 1858 today the court appears to invalidate or .....

Clinton Vs. City of New York

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the hospitals without regard to the tax implications it is equally speculative whether the desired exercise of the court s remedial ..... preferences in the award of city contracts denied its members equal protection of the laws id at 658 659 the association ..... precision it seems to promise for a tariff that literally equalized domestic and foreign production costs would because of transport costs have .....

Ranbir Singh and Another Vs. State of Haryana and Others

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1998)119PLR221

..... stenographers recognised v union of india supra however this court explained the principle of equal pay for equal work by holding that differentiation in pay scales among government servants holding same posts ..... as not violating article 14 and as not being contrary to the principle of equal pay for equal work this court also said that the judgment of administrative authorities concerning the .....

Shri NaIn Singh Bhakuni and ors. Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1998IAD(SC)196; AIR1998SC622; JT1998(1)SC43; 1998(1)SCALE43; (1998)3SCC348; [1998]1SCR41

..... qualifications for recruitment there was no reason why similar treatment on the principle of equal pay for equal work should not be given to the appellants as was given to their counter ..... hat even different educational qualifications would not by itself be a criterion to deny equal pay for equal work to the employees otherwise similarly circumscribed in the aforesaid decision it was noted .....

Ashok Kumar Pattanaik and ors. Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (1998)6SCC176

..... of the two cadres of ministerial staff aforesaid and still on the ground of equal pay for equal work the original four appellants remain entitled to the monetary benefits as indicated hereinabove ..... staff employees working in district establishments for being treated alike on the question of equal pay for equal work despite belonging to a separate cadre will obviously remain subject to scrutiny in .....