Equalize - Judgment Search Results

Shapiro Vs. Thompson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... compelling state interest under this standard the waiting period requirement clearly violates the equal protection clause footnote 21 v connecticut and pennsylvania argue however that the constitutional ..... requirement would be unconstitutional congress may not authorize the states to violate the equal protection clause perhaps congress could induce wider state participation in school construction if .....

Kirkpatrick Vs. Preisler

Court: US Supreme Court

..... attempt to achieve a 2 level of variance rather than to seek population equality equal representation for equal numbers of people is a principle designed to prevent debasement of voting power ..... the command of art i 2 that states create congressional districts which provide equal representation for equal numbers of people permits only the limited population variances which are unavoidable despite .....

Wells Vs. Rockefeller

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the command of art i 2 that states create congressional districts which provide equal representation for equal numbers of people permits only the limited population variances which are unavoidable ..... which elucidates the command of wesberry that congressional districting meet the standard of equal representation for equal numbers of people as nearly as is practicable the district court correctly held .....

D.R. Oza Vs. Government of Gujarat, Revenue and Agricultural Departmen ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1971Guj39

..... hostile treatment what is insisted upon is not hypothetical equality or equality in matters of minor importance or matters of detail ..... at all article 16 as i have mentioned guarantees equal treatment or equal justice even in case of temporary employees and the ..... special privilege being conferred in favour of any individual this equality forbids any class legislation or governmental action based on .....

First Nat'l Bank in Plant City Vs. Dickinson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... since florida does not permit branching privileges to state banks the congressional policy of competitive equality forecloses the comptroller of the currency from modifying that standard p 396 u s 138 ..... the passage of the banking act of 1933 which further strengthened the policy of competitive equality some members argued that bank failures were due to the undercapitalization of small rural banks .....

Kramer Vs. Union Free Sch. Dist. No. 15

Court: US Supreme Court

..... private schools appellant asserts that excluding him from participation in the district elections denies him equal protection of the laws he contends that he and others of his class are ..... whether classifications allegedly limiting the franchise to those resident citizens primarily interested deny those excluded equal protection of the laws depends inter alia on whether all those excluded are in fact .....

Hunter Vs. Erickson

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the akron city council enacted a fair housing ordinance which established a commission on equal opportunity in housing to enforce the antidiscrimination sections through conciliation or persuasion if ..... of this type which are grounded upon general democratic principle do not violate the equal protection clause simply because they occasionally operate to disadvantage negro political interests if .....

Dharmiah and ors. Vs. the Chief Engineer, Panchayat Raj, Government of ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1970AP236

..... to promote efficiency of service without sacrificing the principle of equality of opportunity in the matter of public employment it was ..... 31 b deal with various basic rights the right to equality the right to freedom the right against exploitation the right ..... not by an executive order by legislatioin this argument is equally misconceived under article 12 the state includes the government and .....

Gaston County Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... would produce a real irony years of violation of the 14th amendment right of equal protection through equal education would become the excuse for continuing violation of the 15th amendment right to ..... the prohibitions differences which are reflected in the record before the committee would mean that equal application of the tests would abridge 15th amendment rights this advantage to whites is directly .....

North Carolina Vs. Pearce

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 719 721 b imposition of a more severe sentence upon retrial does not violate the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment since there is no invidious classification of those ..... each defendant in order to set the appropriate sentence accordingly these defendants are not denied equal protection when the state makes no provision for reevaluation of sentences generally but permits the .....