Equalize - Judgment Search Results

Diamond Nat'l Corp. Vs. State Bd. of Equalization

Court: US Supreme Court

..... very question which confronts us here arose in western lithograph co v state board of equalization 11 cal 2d 156 78 p 2d 731 1938 in that case the plaintiff vendor ..... court diamond nat l corp v state bd of equalization 425 u s 268 1976 diamond national corp v state board of equalization no 75 1038 decided april 19 1976 425 u .....

Buckley Vs. Valeo

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the expenditure limitations might otherwise play in enforcing the contribution ceilings the interest in equalizing the financial resources of candidates competing for federal office is no more convincing ..... corrupt pressures on officeholders delayed disclosure of this sort would not serve the equally important informational function played by pre election reporting moreover the public interest in .....

General Elec. Co. Vs. Gilbert

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a claim that a very similar disability program established under california law violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment because that plan s exclusion of pregnancy ..... from the otherwise comprehensive program and upon the purported justifications for such exclusions the equal employment opportunity commission the women plaintiffs and the lower courts reason that the pregnancy .....

Runyon Vs. Mccrary

Court: US Supreme Court

..... a state statute providing free textbooks to students attending private segregated schools violated the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment indeed norwood expressly noted that some private discrimination ..... 427 u s 206 from the fourteenth amendment statute accompanied by the confirmatory sidenote equal rights under the law second and more importantly the majority s argument is logically .....

Craig Vs. Boren

Court: US Supreme Court

..... establishes that state liquor regulatory schemes cannot work invidious discriminations that violate the equal protection clause following this approach both federal and state courts uniformly have ..... between maleness and drunk driving is constitutionally insufficient therefore does not pose an equal protection issue concerning discrimination between males and females the clearest demonstration of .....

Massachusetts Bd. of Retirement Vs. Murgia

Court: US Supreme Court

..... than strict scrutiny is the proper standard for determining whether the statute violates equal protection equal protection analysis requires strict scrutiny of a legislative classification only when it ..... most deferential statements of the rationality standard in assessing the validity under the equal protection clause of much noneconomic legislation but there are problems with deciding cases .....

United States Vs. Maccollom

Court: US Supreme Court

..... and have his conviction reviewed on direct appeal the unfairness born of discrimination denying equal protection is as offensive to the constitution as any unfairness resulting from procedural deficiencies ..... in the unbroken line of our decisions that make no distinction for purposes of equal protection analysis between collateral proceedings and trials and direct appeals any distinction must .....

Additional District Magistrate, Jabalpur Vs. Shivakant Shukla

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1976SC1207; 1976CriLJ945; (1976)2SCC521; [1976]SuppSCR172; 1976(8)LC610(SC)

..... can also be said sometimes to be implied as necessary parts of the protection of equality and equal protection of laws conferred by article 14 of the constitution where one of the ..... the individual 2 all members of society private persons and governmental officials alike must be equally responsible before the law and 3 effective judicial remedies are more important than abstract constitutional .....

City of New Orleans Vs. Dukes

Court: US Supreme Court

..... economy of new orleans when local economic regulation is challenged solely as violating the equal protection clause this court consistently defers to legislative determinations as to the desirability ..... that these principles of course govern only when no constitutional provision other than the equal protection clause itself is apposite very different principles govern even economic regulation when .....

Washington Vs. Davis

Court: US Supreme Court

..... alone and without regard to discriminatory purpose suffices to prove racial discrimination violating the equal protection clause absent some justification going substantially beyond what would be necessary to ..... requirements would require major modifications in light of the unequal impact rule silverman equal protection economic legislation and racial discrimination 25 vand l rev 1183 1972 see .....