Equalize - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: equalize Year: 1981 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.026 seconds)W. and S. Life Ins. Co. Vs. Board of Equalization
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-26-1981
..... 11 second the fourteenth amendment ratified in 1868 introduced the constitutional requirement of equal protection prohibiting the states from acting arbitrarily or treating similarly situated persons ..... imposed an additional privilege tax on foreign corporations which southern railway challenged on equal protection grounds the court held that classifications among corporations for purposes of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCounty of Washington Vs. Gunther
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-08-1981
..... of the amendment is that it incorporates the substantive standard of the equal pay act the equal pay for equal work standard into title vii a number of considerations support that view ..... desire to avoid the burdens associated with governmental intervention into wage structures the equal pay act s equal pay for equal work formula reflects the outcome of this legislative balancing in construing title .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMinnesota Vs. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jan-21-1981
..... amendment to the united states constitution and art 1 7 of the minnesota constitution equal protection under the fourteenth amendment and prohibition of unreasonable burdens on interstate commerce ..... constitutional standard in this case however the minnesota supreme court applied the correct federal equal protection standard and properly declined to consider the commerce clause the majority reverses .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorthwest Airlines, Inc. Vs. Transport Workers
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-20-1981
..... similarly counsels against recognition of the implied right petitioner advocates in this case the equal pay act and title vii establish comprehensive programs designed to eliminate certain varieties of ..... argues as follows contribution would undermine the policies and interfere with enforcement of the equal pay act for somewhat different reasons contribution would undermine the policies and interfere .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.P. Gupta Vs. President of India and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Dec-30-1981
Reported in: AIR1982SC149; 1981Supp(1)SCC87; [1982]2SCR365
..... philosophy in active unison with the socialistic articles of the constitution and second but equally important built in resistance to pushes and pressures by class interests private prejudices government ..... governed by a written constitution designed to secure to all its citizens justice liberty equality and fraternity in their various facets a constitutional democracy to portrayed has its .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMian Bashir Ahmad and Etc. Vs. State of J. and K. and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Nov-13-1981
..... principle of reasonableness which legally as well as philosophically is an essential element of equality or non arbitrariness pervades article 14 like a brooding omnipresence and the procedure contemplated ..... be labelled as defectors the argument was that the impugned provision treats equal unequally and unequals as equals which was in substance and in effect clearly discriminatory and violative of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCbs, Inc. Vs. Fcc
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-01-1981
..... 1 supra although petitioners adverted to the disruption of regular programming and the potential equal time requests from rival candidates in their responses to the carter mondale presidential ..... were we to provide the half hour program you seek accommodating potential requests for equal treatment from other candidates for presidential nomination would involve massive disruptions of the regular .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMichael M. Vs. Superior Ct.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-23-1981
..... can become pregnant suggests that the statutory gender discrimination rather than being invidious actually ensures equality of treatment since only females are subject to a risk of pregnancy the plurality ..... enforcement of the law a rule that authorizes punishment of only one of two equally guilty wrongdoers violates the essence of the constitutional requirement that the sovereign must govern .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWidmar Vs. Vincent
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Dec-08-1981
..... discrimination against religious activity and discussion violated their rights to free exercise of religion equal protection and freedom of speech under the first and fourteenth amendments to the ..... groups counsel for respondents recognized that the first amendment argument relied upon would apply equally to nonstudent groups he recognized that respondents submission would require the university to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRostker Vs. Goldberg
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1981
..... adversely affecting combat readiness could predictably be obtained through volunteers in that event the equal protection component of the fifth amendment would not require the united states to go ..... added there was however no suggestion at the congressional hearings that simultaneous induction of equal numbers of males and female conscripts was either necessary or desirable the defense department .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial