Equalize - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: equalize Year: 1979 Page 1 of about 879 results (0.024 seconds)Chapman Vs. Houston Welfare Rights Organization
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-14-1979
..... the additional language describing a limited category of acts of congress those providing for equal rights plainly negates the notion that jurisdiction over al statutory claims had already been ..... their awareness that the problems confronting them with respect to circuit court jurisdiction applied equally to the district courts since those two tribunals were to have identical concurrent jurisdiction .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSteelworkers Vs. Weber
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-27-1979
..... g orwell nineteen eighty four 181 182 1949 today s decision represents an equally dramatic and equally unremarked switch in this court s interpretation of title vii the operative ..... obviously responding to the minority report s charge that federal agencies particularly the equal employment opportunity commission would equate discrimination with racial imbalance the republican sponsors of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGreat American Fed. Sav. and Loan Assn. Vs. Novotny
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-11-1979
..... quoted supra at 403 u s 100 the language requiring intent to deprive of equal protection or equal privileges and immunities means that there must be some racial or perhaps otherwise ..... alternatively an employee who believes himself aggrieved must first file a charge with the federal equal employment opportunity commission footnote 12 the time limitations for administrative and judicial filing are .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew York City Transit Auth. Vs. Beazer
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-1979
..... fourteenth amendment the district court found that ta s blanket methadone policy violates the equal protection clause and granted injunctive relief which however authorized ta to exclude methadone users ..... concern matters of personnel policy that do not implicate the principle safeguarded by the equal protection clause footnote 38 as the district court recognized the special classification created by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBachan Singh S/O Saudagar Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: May-04-1979
Reported in: (1982)3SCC24; 19831SCR145;
..... court while noticing the social and personel circumstances possessing an extenuating impact has equally clearly highlighted that in india under present conditions deterrence through death penalty may ..... and bodies have relevance in determining the constitutional validity of death penalty and equally important in construing and applying the equivocal formulae of the constitution would be .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWashington Vs. Fishing Vessel Assn.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1979
..... conservation of the various species in so holding the court again explicitly rejected the equal opportunity theory although nontreaty fishermen might be subjected to any reasonable state fishing regulation ..... discretionary matter footnote 20 the washington supreme court held that the treaties would violate equal protection principles if they provided fishing rights to indians that were not also .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRose Vs. Mitchell
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jul-02-1979
..... jury discrimination involves charges that state officials are violating the direct command of the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment and federal statutes passed thereunder that n o ..... adopted after the war between the states including the fourteenth amendment were aimed the equal protection clause was central to the fourteenth amendment s prohibition of discriminatory action by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCaban Vs. Mohammed
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-24-1979
..... 2 the sex based distinction in 111 between unmarried mothers and unmarried fathers violates the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment because it bears no substantial relation to any important ..... the fact that an unusual application of a state statute has been held unconstitutional on equal protection grounds does not necessarily eliminate the entire statute as a basis for future .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPersonnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-05-1979
..... cases signaled no departure from the settled rule that the fourteenth amendment guarantees equal laws not equal results davis upheld a job related employment test that white people passed in ..... sess 1977 report of comptroller general conflicting congressional policies veterans preference and apportionment vs equal employment opportunity sept 29 1977 mr justice stevens with whom mr justice white joins .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVance Vs. Bradley
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Feb-22-1979
..... service aiming at superior achievement can hardly be characterized as illegitimate and it is equally untenable to suggest that providing promotion opportunities through the selection out process and ..... service aiming at superior achievement can hardly be characterized as illegitimate and it is equally untenable to suggest that providing promotion opportunities through the selection out process and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial