Skip to content


Equalize - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: equalize Year: 1928 Page 1 of about 286 results (0.024 seconds)
Apr 04 1928 (PC)

In Re: Bai Manek; in Re: Chimanlal Somchand Shah

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-04-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom418; (1928)30BOMLR958

fawcett j 1 in this case the petitioner was willing to provide a separate residence for his wife in the...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 09 1928 (FN)

Casey Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-09-1928

casey v united states 276 u s 413 1928 u s supreme court casey v united states 276 u s...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 27 1928 (PC)

A.R.M. Karappan Chettiar and anr. Vs. Raja Kumara Venkata Perumal Raja ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-27-1928

Reported in: 116Ind.Cas.841

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1928 (PC)

K. Shanmugasundara Mudaliar and ors. Vs. S. Ratnavelu Mudaliar and ors ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-11-1928

Reported in: AIR1929Mad429; 121Ind.Cas.16

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 12 1928 (PC)

Somu Iyer Vs. Chelliah Pillai and anr.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-12-1928

Reported in: 119Ind.Cas.43

..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases ..... appear to be a product of the application of the right to equality a person who was never involved in any criminal case cannot be ..... who were never involved in criminal cases need not be treated as equals to or on par with persons who were involved in criminal cases .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 1928 (PC)

K. Swaminatha Aiyar and anr. Vs. S.M.C.T. Ramaswami Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-26-1928

Reported in: 117Ind.Cas.139

..... religious endowment dedication of properties to kattalai in temple provision enabling alienation for purchase of equally good properties sale by trustee to third person for no necessity conveyance of trustee s .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 10 1928 (PC)

Hari Janardhan Limaye Vs. Krishnaji Balkrishna Bhate

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-10-1928

Reported in: AIR1928Bom323; (1928)30BOMLR724; 113Ind.Cas.515

..... the mortgaged properly dismissal of application on the ground of absence of personal decree subs equal application for personal decree time taken up in execution proceedings cannot be deducted maintainability of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 28 1928 (FN)

Quaker City Cab Co. Vs. Commonwealth

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-28-1928

..... like receipts of individuals and partnerships in the same kind of business held 1 the equal protection clause of the fourteenth amendment extends to foreign corporations within the jurisdiction of ..... intelligent just minded civilized man could rationally favor in passing upon legislation assailed under the equality clause we have declared that the classification must rest upon a difference which is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 1928 (FN)

Louisville Gas and Elec. Co. Vs. Coleman

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Apr-30-1928

..... independent consideration and decision the contention on behalf of plaintiff in error is that the equal protection clause is contravened by the provisions exempting from the operation of the tax first ..... mortgage taking account of the difference in the dates of maturity in determining whether the equal treatment required by the federal constitution has been afforded we must of course consider all .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 1928 (FN)

Hopkins Vs. Southern California Tel. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-03-1928

..... respondents as the statute directs respondents made regular reports to the state board of equalization showing their operative property including telephone instruments and their gross receipts from every source ..... the gross receipts and taking therefrom the specified percentage thus the imposition becomes approximately equal to what other property bears unless the gross receipts tax be so treated some .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //