Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2017 Page 1 of about 601 results (0.093 seconds)Petitioner Vs. Development Commissioner, Falta Economic Zone and Ors.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Sep-15-2017
export proceeds in respect of such exports as such the contention of the customs authorities that export in such a manner procedure prescribed by the central government 15 a unit or developer may procure goods and services from another unit located in
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSgs Constructions & Developers Pvt. Ltd vs.housing and Urban Developme ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
property 21 acres of land is unencumbered the high court could not have adjudicated on the property rights under the guise and urban development corporation ltd hudco versus sgs construction and developers pvt ltd ors appellant respondents lpa2232016 cm nos 12347 12348
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSgs Construction & Developers Pvt Ltd. Vs.housing and Urban Developmen ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
as unencumbered however certainly it is an issue which needs consideration by lpas no 221 223 225 248 249 of 2016 nos 29428 2015 31482 2015 6095 2016 respondents sgs constructions developers pvt ltd petitioner versus housing and urban development corporation ltd
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSgs Constructions & Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs.housing and Urban Developm ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
contended that the drt delhi had no territorial jurisdiction to conduct the proceedings since the property no 6 is situated in 3047 2016 cm nos 12862 12864 2016 respondents sgs constructions developers pvt ltd petitioner versus lpas no 221 223 225 248
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHousing and Urban Development Corporation Ltd (Hudco) vs.sgs Construct ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-01-2017
in our opinion it was not open to the high court to take up these questions under writ the properties as ors respondents lpa2252016 cm nos 12401 12403 2016 sgs construction developers pvt ltd appellant versus housing and urban development corporation ltd
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParsvnath Developers Limited & Another vs.rail Land Development Author ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-10-2017
is accordingly disposed of order dasti under signatures of the court master sanjeev sachdeva j october10 2017 sn o m p comm 34 2017 judgment delivered on 10 10 2017 parsvnath developers limited another petitioners versus rail land development authority respondent advocates
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBinay Kumar Choudhary Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
..... food public distribution and consumer affairs department finance department social welfare women and child development department urban development department etc on different posts in the prescribed scale of pay those who had ..... in the erstwhile state of bihar between the period 1978 to 1990 the project was co sponsored by the central government and the state government some of the petitioners were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMukta Mathur Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
..... food public distribution and consumer affairs department finance department social welfare women and child development department urban development department etc on different posts in the prescribed scale of pay those who had ..... in the erstwhile state of bihar between the period 1978 to 1990 the project was co sponsored by the central government and the state government some of the petitioners were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Lakhan Sahu Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
..... food public distribution and consumer affairs department finance department social welfare women and child development department urban development department etc on different posts in the prescribed scale of pay those who had ..... in the erstwhile state of bihar between the period 1978 to 1990 the project was co sponsored by the central government and the state government some of the petitioners were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmbika Prasad Vs. Human Resource Development
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Jun-16-2017
..... food public distribution and consumer affairs department finance department social welfare women and child development department urban development department etc on different posts in the prescribed scale of pay those who had ..... in the erstwhile state of bihar between the period 1978 to 1990 the project was co sponsored by the central government and the state government some of the petitioners were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial