Co Developer - Judgment Search Results

Kishorebhai Bhailalbhai Patel Vs. Development Commissioner of the Stat ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1995)2GLR1502

agenda was prepared on 23 5 1991 the second meeting could not be convened for want of quorum and therefore was appeal which was preferred against the order of the district development officer bharuch removing the petitioner from the office of sarpanch

Jaswant Singh Vs. Development of Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IIIAD(Delhi)646; 59(1995)DLT612; 1995(34)DRJ423

department the respondent no 1 did not agree to these conditions and thereforee the petitioner was not in a position to favor of the claimant is under challenge by the delhi development authority an agreement was entered into for the construction of

Shashikant Janardan Pimpalpure Vs. Development Corpn. of Vidarbha Ltd.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1996)IIILLJ570Bom

the respondent no 1 corporation but there being no service conditions framed relating to the employees working in the carpet weaving

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

..... authority authorities of the area included in the coal mining development area of the authority h contribution from panchayat funds agricultural ..... hingir rampur coal co v state of orissa 1961 2scr537 the orissa act was passed for constituting a mining area development fund in ..... co exist since they do not cover the same field it was argued that the impugned act was concerned with the development .....

Anz Grindlays Bank Pie Vs. the Commissioner, Mcd and ors.

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995IIAD(Delhi)573; 1995(34)DRJ492

..... for differentiating the suit plot from other plots in safdarjang development area panchsheel enclave pamposh enclave etc the condition laid down ..... which were accordingly provided for these colonies which would be developed and those building which would be brought into existence under ..... to be legitimate and not illegitimate one 111 laamrit bansapati co ltd vs state of punjab 1992 59 elt13 sc the .....

Smt. Malti Kaul and Another Vs. Allahabad Development Authority and An ...

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: AIR1995All397; (1995)2UPLBEC974

..... on the government to issue direction to the development authorities for imposing development fee under this section government can issue ..... authorised to issue directions of administrative nature to the development authorities the government cannot derive any power from section ..... be provided or the development had been agreed to be carried out by a coloniser or co opertive housing society through .....

Shabi Construction Company Vs. City and Industrial Development Corpora ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: JT1995(4)SC618; (1995)2MLJ62(SC); 1995(2)SCALE836; (1995)4SCC301; [1995]3SCR534

to be the new town development authority for that township consequent upon such declaration the respondent no 1 assumed by virtue the partnership act and carries on business as builders and developers while the respondent no 1 is a government company within

Coastal Papers Limited, Rep. by Its Managing Director, Mr. C.V. Rao Vs ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1996(1)ALT54

..... irrigation project being implemented on river vamsadhara the area has good irrigation potential for further development of cane coastal papers limited was recommended for letter of intent similar application was ..... villages of six mandals from the area of co operative sugar factory and allotting the same to vasavi section 11 of the industries development and regulation act 1951 provides that no .....

P. Ram Reddy and ors. Vs. Land Acquisition Officer, Hyderabad Urban De ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1995(2)ALT15(SC); JT1995(1)SC593; 1995(1)SCALE332a; (1995)2SCC305; [1995]1SCR584

acquired land had high potentiality for developing into a housing colony in determining its market value of the acquired land and regard is of public authorities or local boards or private developers who will have formed such layouts of building plots in

Jmp Manufacturingg Co. Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1995(35)DRJ559

..... has further submitted that after the notification of the area as a development area no development of any nature could be carried out on the land in question ..... of land the area covered by hatches belongs to m s jmp mfg co pvt ltd the petitioner in cwp no 4776 93 the property situated on ..... of appearance 4 5 during the pendency of the civil suit jmp mfg co pvt ltd filed cwp 4776 93 on 12 10 1993 in this .....