Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 1968 Page 1 of about 376 results (0.096 seconds)Workmen of the Indian Leaf Tobacco Development Co., Ltd., Guntur Vs. t ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970SC860; [1970(20)FLR269]; [1969]2SCR282
v pipraich sugar mills mazdoor union 1957 illj235sc where the court explained the reason for the decision given by the labour an industrial dispute between the respondent the indian leaf tobacco development company limited guntur hereinafter referred to as the company and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatubha K. Vaghela Vs. Moosa Raza, the District Development Officer
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-21-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR23
..... who is appointed as a competent authority to the district development officer or the taluka development officer of the panchayat concerned the delegation would be legal ..... stated by lord cranworth l c in ranger v great western railway co 1854 5 house of lords cases 72 the judge or the ..... of the privy council by lord james of herford in clouston and co and v corry 1906 a c 122 now the sufficiency of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWool Industry Development Co-operative Association Ltd. Vs. Khadi and ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-01-1968
Reported in: ILR1968KAR638; (1968)2MysLJ136
..... functions of the commission which included the encouragement of the production of khadi and the development of village industries and research in the technique of the production of khadi section 19 ..... the commission after a consideration of the whole question discovered that a large number of co operative societies did not undertake production and retail sales activities of woolen blankets in .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMansa Nagar Panchayat and anr. Vs. A.K. Chakravarty Dist. Development ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-19-1968
Reported in: (1969)10GLR88
..... of the state government in that behalf accordingly the district development officer respondent issued a notification on 3 7 1968 setting ..... the chairman of that panchayat the respondent is the district development officer there the general election was held in december 1963 ..... namely petitioner no 2 in each case also became automatically co extensive with the term of the panchayat by reason of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMetal Box Company of India Ltd. Vs. their Workmen
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-20-1968
Reported in: AIR1969SC612; [1969]39CompCas410(SC); [1969(18)FLR336]; [1969]73ITR53(SC); (1969)ILLJ785SC; [1969]1SCR750
..... income tax act bonus payable to labour provisions for tax development rebate or development allowance and reserves item 2 of schedule ii requires these ..... the available surplus this court in khandesh spinning and weaving mills co ltd v rashtriya girni kamgar sangh 1960 18 f j r ..... in respect of an ascertainable sum of money in standard mills co ltd v commissioner of income tax 1967 63itr470 sc the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Pvt. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Special Tahsildar, La ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1968
Reported in: AIR1969Mad305
..... public purpose further the state govfernment have allotted plots to various industrialists after acquisition as developed sites ranging from 20 acres to one acre the petitioner company has purchased about 22 ..... second respondent state of madras represented by the secretary to the government industries labour and co operation department and the declaration under section 6 1 of the land acquisition act .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGodrej and Boyce Mfg. Co. Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. the Special Tahsil ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-24-1968
Reported in: (1968)2MLJ273
court had no occasion to discuss article 14 of the constitution learned counsel for the state further contended that once there of such allotment by the government of factory space or developed sites it is worthwhile to remember the words of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Ellerman Lines Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Apr-10-1968
Reported in: [1970]75ITR47(Cal)
..... assistant commissioner 7 the other question relates to the allowance of development rebate which the appellate assistant commissioner had ordered to be ..... a letter written in response to the letter of turner morrison co the letter itself from the secretary central board of revenue ..... the secretary central board of revenue to messrs turner morrison co ltd quoted above itself shows that it was not the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSundaram Motors Private Ltd. and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Jan-25-1968
Reported in: [1969]71ITR587(Mad)
no 81 of 1964 the applicant is a private limited company dealing in the purchase and sale of motor spare parts or the plant as enumerated above are entitled to claim development rebate thereto as put forward by them before the revenue
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTIn Re: the India Electric Works Ltd.
Court: Kolkata
Decided on: Aug-27-1968
Reported in: AIR1970Cal398
..... has been taken over by the central government under the industries development and regulation act are not debarred from holding meetings and passing ..... petition is being opposed by several creditors namely james finlay and co whose claim against the company is for rs 59 527 ..... learned counsel for one of the opposing creditors james finlay and co submitted that no order should be made on the petition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial