Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2013 Page 1 of about 846 results (0.112 seconds)The Rajasthan State Industrial Development and Investment Corporation ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-12-2013
..... appellant riico looses all its lands and properties and rendered the development authority existing on papers only without any status authority 28 the ..... the land which was allotted and that riico had failed to co operate with the respondent company to accomplish the task it had ..... the land which was allotted and that riico had failed to co operate with the respondent company to accomplish the task it had .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Member of the Executive Council for Finance and Economic Developme ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: Sep-27-2013
..... lewis ponnan tshiqi and wallis jja concurring 1 the respondent masifundisane training and development college masifundisane successfully instituted application proceedings before the kwazulu natal high court pietermaritzburg ..... masifundisane was to assist the department in developing primary secondary and tertiary co operatives registered in terms of s 7 of the co operatives act 14 of 2005 over a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJaksons Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Delhi Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-29-2013
duac for approval on 21 03 2011 the duac vide communication dated 02 04 2011 approved the completion plans consequently after delivered on 29 10 2013 arb a 22 2013 jaksons developers pvt ltd appellant versus delhi development authority respondent advocates who
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBalkrishna V. Dessai, Technician, Goa Industrial Development Corporati ...
Court: Mumbai Goa
Decided on: Mar-11-2013
of assistant field manager as per the recruitment rules by considering eligible candidates and to give promotion on the basis of 2 10 the recruitment rules known as the goa industrial development corporation goa idc class a b c d posts
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHousing Development and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Mumbai Internationa ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-23-2013
..... reimbursement of such costs to mial the developer shall be entitled to the developer s rights in developer s portion and developer s development potential the developer hereby undertakes to execute all such ..... 2 society by filing a dispute before the co operative court challenged the terms and conditions referred to in the development agreement however they did not challenge the resolution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMagaliesberg Protection Association Vs. Mec: Department of Agriculture ...
Court: South Africa Supreme Court of Appeal
Decided on: May-30-2013
1 notwithstanding any other act no person may ldquo 1 commence an activity listed or specified in terms of section 24 statutory framework in 1965 in response to increasing intrusion by developers the then department of planning and the environment recommended the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVardhman Developers Ltd. Vs. Borla Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. a ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-22-2013
..... been held by this court in the decision dated 7 march 2011 in vardhaman developers limited v thailambal co operative housing society ltd and ors wherein the learned single judge observed as under ..... the learned single judge delivered on 7th march 2011 in the case of vardhaman developers limited vs thailambal co op hsg soc ltd and ors in notice of motion no 3274 of 2010 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHousing Development and Infrastructure Limited Vs. Mumbai Internationa ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-28-2013
..... released land slum rehabilitation contract clause 1 1 definitions of developer s land developers development potential developer s portion developer s right in developer s portion mial portion released land that the purpose ..... reprobate is very well settled cauvery coffee traders mangalore v hornor resource international co ltd 2011 10 scc 420 is hdils invocation of that principle justified that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVithal Rana Bhopi and Another Vs. City and Industrial Development Corp ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Apr-26-2013
of town planning raigad alibag to this petition it is contended therein that under the notifications dated 28th march 1971 and brief 3 the first respondent is the city and industrial development corporation limited it is a government company within the meaning
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNew Okhla Industrial Development Authority Vs. Sarvpriya Sehkari Avas ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Apr-11-2013
..... government to declare an area to be developed as a development area and constitute development authority for that area section 41 of ..... of khodaiji committee report which is otherwise available to the co operative housing societies cannot be given to the petitioner ..... the petitioner 8217 s society is definitely a registered housing co operative society therefore the denial of benefit of khodaiji .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial