Co Developer - Judgment Search Results

Smt. Khirodini Sahoo Vs. State of Orissa Represented Through Its Commi ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: 82(1996)CLT32; 1996(I)OLR387

that both the appellant and the intervenor has made unauthorised construction it is in a basti area heard all the parties commissioner cum secretary to government in the housing and urban development department in short the commissioner in an appeal under section

Development Consultants Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Gift-tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1997)61ITD119Cal

..... 81 dated 24 25 8 1981 on the subject a copy of which is enclosed development consultants private limited dcpl applied for land in the salt lake city and steps were ..... over the unspent amount out of the deposit the subsidiary company was also obliged to co operate with the assessee in the further construction clause 12 stipulated that if the construction .....

Development Investors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax

Court: Guwahati

company was bad and it had been facing serious financial constraints after a period of time it showed signs of improvement

The Haryana State Cooperative Land Development Banks Employees Union V ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: (1997)115PLR825

the full bench decision of joginder singhs case was regarding constitutional validity of section 14 of hindu succession act and as in the state of haryana the haryana state cooperative land development bank hereinafter referred to as respondent no 1 is an

Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority Vs. Manilal Gordhandas and Other ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1996SC2804; (1996)3GLR580; JT1996(8)SC647; 1996(6)SCALE687; (1996)11SCC482a; [1996]Supp6SCR79

government to sanction the draft development plan only in part covering the area for which the draft development plan had been been received thereto and thereafter accord sanction to the draft development plan and the regulations in such modified form as it

K. Bhattacharjee Vs. Delhi Development Authority

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 63(1996)DLT467; 1996(38)DRJ343

misconceived the petitioners are seeking relief within the realm of contracts they have also raised disputed questions of fact relief does lots like that of a financing scheme iv the delhi development authority by making allotments in anticipation or good hope of

Manjulaben Bhailalbhai Patel and ors. Vs. Vadodara Urban Development A ...

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1996)2GLR588

submit further objections if any and the state government will consider the same before sanctioning the revised draft development plan it for extension of the time for submission of the draft development plan by those authorities to the state government section 17

Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs. the Industrial Development ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VIAD(SC)761; AIR1997SC482; (1996)98BOMLR609; JT1996(8)SC16; (1997)1MLJ49(SC); 1996(6)SCALE379; (1996)11SCC501; [1996]Supp5SCR551

..... for the establishment of an authority for the purpose of planning co ordinating and supervising the proper orderly and rapid development of the area in that region and of executing plans ..... monopolies restrictive trade practices act it submitted to the state government its proposals for the development of the area put under its planning jurisdiction after following the procedure prescribed therein .....

S.A. Builders Vs. Delhi Development Authroity

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1996VAD(Delhi)153; 63(1996)DLT732; 1996(39)DRJ332

from table to table and keeping it on table for considerable time causing delay intentional or otherwise is a routine considerable and the present application filed by the applicant respondent delhi development authority deserves to be dismissed with costs 2 refusing to

Tata Iron and Steel Co. Ltd. Etc. Vs. Union of India and Others and In ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996VAD(SC)678; AIR1996SC2462; 82(1996)CLT875(SC); JT1996(6)SC685; 1996(5)SCALE414; (1996)9SCC709; [1996]Supp3SCR808

be eliminated if captive mining is promoted 55 thereafter the committee took note of paragraph 7 11 of the national mineral that it would be necessary in the interest of mineral development to authorise the renewal of chromite lease to tisco under