Skip to content

Parsvnath Developers Limited & Another vs.rail Land Development Authority - Court Judgment

SooperKanoon Citation
CourtDelhi High Court
Decided On
AppellantParsvnath Developers Limited & Another
RespondentRail Land Development Authority

Excerpt

.....arbitration & conciliation act, 1996 seeking extension of time for making the award. o.m.p.(misc.) (comm.) 34/2017 page 1 of 2 2. learned counsels for the parties submit that the arbitration proceedings have been diligently prosecuted by them.3. it is further submitted that delay has not occurred for any reasons attributable to the arbitral tribunal.4. it is contended that the final arguments have been heard and the matter is reserved by the tribunal for making the award.5. by order dated 27.09.2017, the tribunal has opined that the award is likely to be pronounced by 30.11.2017.6. in view of the above, the time for making the award is enlarged and extended till 30.11.2017.7. 8. the petition is accordingly disposed of. order dasti under signatures of the court master. sanjeev sachdeva, j october10 2017 ‘sn’ o.m.p.(misc.) (comm.) 34/2017 page 2 of 2

Judgment

$~11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % + OMP (MISC.) (COMM.) 34/2017 Judgment delivered on:

10. 10.2017 PARSVNATH DEVELOPERS LIMITED & ANOTHER ........ Petitioner

s versus RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ..... Respondent Advocates who appeared in this case: For the... Petitioner

s For the Respondent : Mr Rahul Malhotra and Mr Shubham Paliwal : Mr Shaurya Sahay, CORAM:-

"HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT1010.2017 SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J.

(ORAL) IA No.11624/ 2017(exemption) Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. O.M.P.(MISC.)(COMM.) 34/2017 1. This is a petition under Section 29A of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking extension of time for making the Award. O.M.P.(Misc.) (COMM.) 34/2017 Page 1 of 2 2. Learned counsels for the parties submit that the arbitration proceedings have been diligently prosecuted by them.

3. It is further submitted that delay has not occurred for any reasons attributable to the Arbitral Tribunal.

4. It is contended that the final arguments have been heard and the matter is reserved by the Tribunal for making the Award.

5. By order dated 27.09.2017, the Tribunal has opined that the Award is likely to be pronounced by 30.11.2017.

6. In view of the above, the time for making the award is enlarged and extended till 30.11.2017.

7. 8. The petition is accordingly disposed of. Order Dasti under signatures of the Court Master. SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J OCTOBER10 2017 ‘Sn’ O.M.P.(Misc.) (COMM.) 34/2017 Page 2 of 2


Save Judgments · Add Notes · Store Search Results · Organize Client Files Start your Free Trial