Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 773 results (0.094 seconds)R.S. Jindal, S/O Late Shri R.D. Jindal, (Ex. Chief Engineer, Dda) Vs. ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-17-2002
Reported in: 102(2003)DLT554; 2003(1)SLJ188(Delhi)
before such institution it was also contended that the petitioner could not have been re employed vide impugned letter dated 15th writ petition vide order dated 15th december 1986 2 delhi development authority dda filed an slp in the supreme court and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTOm Parkash and ors. Vs. the State of Haryana Through the Financial Com ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Oct-10-2002
Reported in: (2003)133PLR662
..... panchayat either the panchayat or its gram sachiv the concerned block development and panchayat officer social education and panchayat officer or any other ..... or deposit in the court the right to seek foreclosure is co extensive with the right to seek redemption since right to seek ..... or deposit in the court the right to seek foreclosure is co extensive with the right to seek redemption since right to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Ram Narain, S/O Shri Chandi Ram Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-23-2002
Reported in: 2003(66)DRJ668
controverter by the respondent yet another submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that in terms of sr 64
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrakash Industries Ltd. Vs. Development Credit Bank Ltd. and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-05-2002
Reported in: JT2002(6)SC386; 2002(5)SCALE498; (2002)6SCC424; 2002(2)LC1180(SC); 2003(2)WLN694
is called for in the order made by the high court civil suit for recovery of money respondent bank took out
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Development Authority Vs. R.S. Yadav
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-22-2002
Reported in: 2002(63)DRJ508
in view of the circumstances of the case the matter could be disposed in terms of the stand taken by dda matrix of the matter suffice it to say that delhi development authority in short dda framed various schemes in terms whereof
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEcil Rapiscan Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Sep-25-2002
Reported in: I(2003)BC222
..... inc canada hereinafter called the canadian company for short and beijing zhongdun security technology development co hereinafter called the chinese company for short their bids are liable to be ..... without notice 4 the petitioner in cw no 2487 2001 beijing zhongdun security technology development co made correspondence with the second respondent for awarding contract which was recommended by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana Builders Limited Vs. the Haryana Urban Development Authority a ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Mar-08-2002
Reported in: AIR2003P& H48
..... per the following terms and conditions and subject to the provisions of the haryana urban development authority act 1977 hereinafter referred to as the act and the rules regulations applicable ..... to the finance secretary that the co op house building societies to whom plots have been allotted haverepresented that payment be deferred till plots are developed the civil amenities havenot been provided .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVisakhapatnam Urban Development Authority, Visakhapatnam Vs. Bharathi ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Feb-21-2002
Reported in: 2002(3)ALD84; 2002(3)ALT272
of the provisions of the act the first appellate court consciously knowing that the ground floor of the building was meant authority under section 56 of the act provided that such development charges shall be levied only with effect from such date
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSalim Akbarali Nanji and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors. and De ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-01-2002
Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR278; 2003(2)BomCR557; [2003]113CompCas141(Bom); [2003]48SCL1(Bom)
..... shareholders depositors creditors customers and constituents that the conversion of respondent no 10 development co operative bank into a joint stock banking company respondent no 11 was effective ..... scrutinised the proposal for conversion after considering the proposal the authorities have incorporated the development co operative bank as a company and issued appropriate licences if there was no .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Prabhawati Tokersi Chheda Vs. Maharashtra Housing and Area Develo ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-27-2002
Reported in: 2002(4)BomCR579
..... during the period of reconstruction the responsibility of providing transitcamp accommodation shall lie with theowner developer co op hsg society 8 9 10 suit if any filed in any court orany litigation ..... in process at present inany court will have to be withdrawn bythe proposed co op society developer owner before n o c is granted an indemnity bond absolving the boardfrom the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial