Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2018 Page 1 of about 541 results (0.101 seconds)Kamal Kishore Saspal vs.development Credit Bank Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-05-2018
be so in view of the decision of the supreme court in narayan chandra ghosh vs uco bank and others reported kishore saspal through mr amarjit singh bedi adv petitioner versus development credit bank ltd respondent through mr hashmat nabi and mr
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRail Land Development Authority vs.parsvnath Developers Limited & Anr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-03-2018
..... by and to have been ceased with the concurrence of the developer and this development agreement shall be deemed to have been terminated by mutual ..... shall be net of any outstanding amount recoverable from the developer under this development o m p comm 72 2018 page 20 of 22 ..... would be called for see mcdermott international inc v burn standard co ltd and ors 2006 11 scc181 33 in view of the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParsvnath Developers Limited & Anr. Vs.rail Land Development Authority
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-31-2018
..... rustogi ms aakriti dawar mr vibhu anshuman advs versus rail land development authority respondent through mr shaurya sahay mr avijit mani tripathi ..... p no 724 2018 page 5 relation to the abovementioned development agreement in such proceedings all objections of the respondent shall ..... placed reliance on the judgment of the supreme court in sbp co vs patel engineering ltd anr 2005 8 scc618 to contend .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRaheja Developers Limited vs.proto Developers and Technologies Limited ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jan-30-2018
..... present case the disputes between the parties are in relation to the developer agreement dated 2nd may 2006 clause 19 of the said agreement provides ..... january 2018 o m p misc 8 2017 raheja developers limited petitioner through mr shalabh singhal mr abinash agarwal advs versus ..... 2 1 e the said view was reiterated somewhat differently in pandey co builders p ltd v state of bihar anr 2007 1 scc467 2007 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi State Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (Ds ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-15-2018
in the schedule b and c above shall include any counter claim made by a party institute indian council of arbitration o m p misc 5 2018 delhi state industrial infrastructure development corporation ltd dsiidc petitioner through ms deepali gupta adv mr
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS & P Infrastructure Developers (P) Ltd & Anr. Vs.national Highways a ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Oct-15-2018
..... and mr raghvendra upadhyay advs petitioners versus national highways and infrastructure development corporation ltd anr through mr anupam lal das mr akhil ..... since the earlier chartered accountant i e m s agarwal priyanka co had resigned as a statutory auditor with effect from 16 ..... by priyanka agarwal on behalf of m s agarwal priyanka and co the appointment letter dated 5 1 2018 issued by aarpee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRail Land Development Authority vs.yantti Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2018
6 rlda claims that the impugned awards are perverse and contrary to law and thus are liable to be set aside shall oblige or entitle as the case may be the developer to the following xxxx xxxx xxxx the development of b
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRail Land Development Authority vs.yantti Buildcon Pvt Ltd
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-02-2018
or to force majeure conditions 102 in view of this court s conclusion that delay is not solely attributable to rlda or the period after the grant effective date and the developer having failed to cure or rectify such defaults within a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChhabildas Vs. The State of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary Urban De ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-06-2018
one year from 16th march 2001 consequently the khopoli municipal council 27 wrote a letter on 23rd april 2001 to the 1894 i of 1894 floor space index fsi or transferable development rights tdr against the area of land surrendered free of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBangalore Development Authority Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Aug-03-2018
the part of the bda in approaching before the high court as well as this court 16 first we take up the city of bangalore state of karnataka and a notified developer it is entrusted with the task of preparation of city
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial