Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2010 Page 1 of about 769 results (0.111 seconds)Rathinammal Vs. the Managing Director, Tamilnadu Housing Board and the ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Mar-25-2010
..... decisions had to some extent resulted in defeating the object of planned development of delhi on which considerable emphasis has been laid by the ..... v new delhi municipal committee 1996 2 scc 459 secretary jaipur development authority v daulat mal jain supra yadu nandan garg v state ..... singh 2000 9 scc 94 union of india v international trading co 2003 5 scc 437 ekta sakthi foundation v govt of nct .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNistar Minz Vs. the State of Jharkhand Through the Chief Secretary, Go ...
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Mar-31-2010
of natural justice it is further submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner retired on 28 02 2009 dated 3 1 2005 annexure 3 issued by the block development officer chandankeyari seeking recovery were quashed and the respondents were
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. (Mrs.) Kamlesh Vasudeva W/O Capt. S. Vasudeva, Owner of Vatika Far ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-21-2010
construction of the building into two separate compartments one compartment consisting of those persons whose applications are considered within time and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSri D.K. Appachchu S/O Late Sri D.K. Kalappa Vs. the Chief Officer, So ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-06-2010
court by exercise of power under article 226 of the constitution of india in this regard the law is well settled
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTProcess and Product Development Centre Employees Association, Agra and ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-28-2010
no 4 has been notified as one of the bodies corporations owned and controlled by the central government by virtue of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP.V. Mohammed Khan S/O Late Sri Attakoya Haji Vs. Union of India Repre ...
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Ernakulam
Decided on: Mar-08-2010
years and 24 years of service a2 subject to certain conditions according to condition no v the primary school teacher and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Development Credit Bank Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-26-2010
Reported in: [2010]323ITR206(Bom)
those which constitute the stock in trade consequently during the course of the assessment proceedings the assessee supplied to the assessing
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS. Ashok Kumar, Assistant Development Vs. State of Kerala, Secretary t ...
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Jun-21-2010
..... 26 06 1988 2 while so the psc recruited the petitioner as block development officer in the rural development department in the quota for by transfer appointment accordingly the petitioner was relieved ..... the appellants were appointed substantively to a permanent vacancy in the co operative department they lost their lien in the rural development department but rule 16 is not absolute the lien has .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTehri Hydro Development Corporation Vs. Alstom Hydro France and anr.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Mar-26-2010
Reported in: 2010(2)SCALE198
there is nothing wrong in such an approach and if consequent to it two price bids have been given by respondent as it appears from the appeal filed by tehri hydro development corporation the appellant assails the direction of the learned single
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S Ranka and Shah Developers Pvt Ltd Vs. State of Karnatakastate of K ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Aug-06-2010
j this petition filed under article 226 227 of the constitution of india praying to quash the preliminary notification dt 9 indicating plot no and terms and conditions of allotment including developmental charges payable by the petitioner will be issued in due
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial