Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 715 results (0.079 seconds)M/s. Zodiac Developers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. M/s. Krishna Developers Through i ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-24-2016
..... presents krishna plaintiff has resigned as developer of the juhu hanuman nagar sra 1 co operative housing society ltd further krishna hereby resigns as developer under the said loi and hereby ..... society and ii hanuman nagar co operative housing society out of them juhu hanuman nagar co operative housing society appointed the plaintiff as their developer whereas another society appointed defendant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Industrial Areas Development Board Vs. M/S Navodaya Industri ...
Court: Karnataka Dharwad
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
..... establishment of industrial areas and to promote establishment and orderly development of industries in furtherance of those objects land was offered ..... the said letter precisely reads thus 29 karnataka industrial areas development board a government of karnataka undertaking 14 3 2nd floor ..... j in verschures creameries ltd v hull and netherlands steamship co ltd 1921 2 kb608 1921 all er rep 215 ca .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Industrial Areas Development Board, A Government of Karnatak ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Apr-26-2016
..... establishment of industrial areas and to promote establishment and orderly development of industries in furtherance of those objects land was offered ..... allotment the said letter precisely reads thus karnataka industrial areas development board a government of karnataka undertaking 14 3 2nd floor ..... j in verschures creameries ltd v hull and netherlands steamship co ltd 1921 2 kb 608 1921 all er rep 215 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKarnataka Fisheries Development Corporation Ltd., and Others Vs. The D ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: May-06-2016
undisputed fact it is not open to the plaintiffs to contend that the jural relationship between them and the defendants is of open spaces or for building purposes or for any development scheme thus it is clear that no lease of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.S. Developers and Contractors Private Limited Vs. Alpha G. Group Dev ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2016
in mahatama gandhi sahakra sakkare karkhane vs national heavy engg coop ltd and anr this court observed if the bank guarantee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMontana Developers Private Limited Vs. Aditya Developers and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-22-2016
is also placed on the judgment of the delhi high court delivered on 28th march 2016 in case of thiess iviinecs
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Maya Developers Vs. Neelam R. Thakkar and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-13-2016
..... terms the division bench of this court said in paragraph 19 that the initial development of the co operative housing society of constructing the building may be the business of the society ..... a restriction is for the avowed purposes 1 of securing proper implementation of co operative production and other development programmes approved or undertaken by government or 2 of securing the proper management .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development Vs. The State of Karnataka
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
..... petition no 8895 2015 citizens forum for mangalore development 204 rayville apartments lower bender mangalore 2 represented by its joint co ordinator ms vidyadinker petitioner by smt jayna kothari ..... adv 2 urban development department vikasa soudha bangalore 560 001 represented by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Bombaywala and Others Vs. State of Maharashtra, through its Secre ...
Court: Mumbai Nagpur
Decided on: Sep-15-2016
..... such as roads highways parkways railways waterways canals and air ports including their extension and development the development plan prepared under section 21 of the mrtp act generally indicates the manner in which ..... per sanctioned map whichever is less of the existing ground level 13 one of the co owners from buty family approached the nit on 8 8 2002 informing that in terms .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCitizens Forum for Mangalore Development, Represented by its Joint Co- ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Dec-13-2016
the total number of buildings will be violative of development control rules or unauthorised structure b under the act demolition action have any deterrent effect as it is very economical for developers to violate the prescribed bye laws and then regularize by
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial