Co Developer - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 1998 Page 1 of about 714 results (0.121 seconds)Shamir Singh, District Manager, the Punjab State Cooperative Agricultu ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-23-1998
Reported in: (1998)119PLR29
1920 by the punjab amendment act of 1973 right of contest being contrary to custom had been totally effaced and taken
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnsal Properties and Industries Ltd. Vs. Appropriate Authority and ors ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-30-1998
Reported in: 72(1998)DLT84
..... rules 1962 and transfer of property act petitioner was builder and developer of land application for approval of transfer of flat department directed ..... way of becoming a member of or acquiring shares in a co operative society company or other aop or by way of any ..... whether the property consists of i ownership or ii membership of co operative society or association of person or a company please indicate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri Anthony John Pereira Vs. the Minister for Urban Development, Gove ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-06-1998
Reported in: 1998(2)ALLMR457; 1998(3)BomCR453; (1998)1BOMLR267; 1998(2)MhLj404
..... petitioner s case does not fall in the proviso the petitioner is clearly liable for development charges as stated earlier the petitioner s application for permission was expressly refused the petitioner ..... land belonging to the petitioner as also to one other society by name the citizen co operative society in the submission of shri chinoy permission initially was refused in respect of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGajanan Narayan Malik and Another Vs. Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. and ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-09-1998
Reported in: 1999(2)BomCR118
in respect of some buildings have commenced as also some columns beyond that nothing has been done respondents have failed to 13 issuance of certified copy expedited 14 appeal allowed the developer filed a suit for enforcement of his agreement with the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGuru Teg Bahadur Public School Society Vs. Delhi Development Authority ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-21-1998
Reported in: 75(1998)DLT507
..... mechanical lead to be involved for the supply of earth for the development of plot of land allotted to guru teg bahadur public school will ..... at model town zone c 19 new delhi after carrying out the development work thereon and by other necessary repairs filling up activity and to ..... laid down nearly 400 years ago in rooke s case 1598 5 co rep 99 as follows for discretion is a science or understanding to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Radhakrishna Co-operative Housing Society Limited, Hosur, Hubli an ...
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Mar-27-1998
Reported in: 1999(2)KarLJ637
agreement of the owner it is said to have been compulsorily acquired in these cases the land owners have come forward 1987 provides for acquisition of land for the purpose of development of major and important urban areas in the state of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHaryana Urban Development Authority Vs. Smt. Raj Dulhari and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-05-1998
Reported in: AIR1998P& H283; (1998)119PLR757
..... misconception it is incorrect understanding of the statutory functions under a social legislation a development authority while developing the land or framing a scheme for housing discharges statutory duty the purpose and ..... not contain any restriction on the number of applications which could be made by the co operative group housing societies is a clear proof of the intention of the authority that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDelhi Development Authority Vs. Shyama Prasad Mukherjee Park Plot Hold ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-14-1998
Reported in: 3(1998)CLT705; 75(1998)DLT169; 1998(47)DRJ147
..... the remaining land was acquired and transferred to delhi development authority for developing the same into a commercial centre 22 relying on ..... order these letters patent appeals have been filed by delhi development authority as the appellant and shyama prasad mukherjee park plot ..... these villages so far as this colony is concerned are co terminus this demarcated boundary area when worked out by plan .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKranti Ghosh Vs. Jammu Development Authority and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: May-22-1998
Reported in: AIR1999J& K84
authority planned organised development of the area is a paramount consideration this is to be taken note of and decided upon submitted that no mandamus can be issued to the jammu development authority to allot the site in dispute to the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Swaroop Chowdhary Vs. Jammu Development Authority and ors.
Court: Jammu and Kashmir
Decided on: Feb-13-1998
Reported in: AIR1998J& K53
urban development for this he is placing reliance on a communication wherein it stands mentioned that the hon ble minister for rupees seven thousand four hundred were deposited with the jammu development authority later on the amount deposited by the petitioner was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial