Co Developer - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: co developer Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 836 results (0.063 seconds)

Sep 28 2006 (HC)

All India Trade Union Congress, Visakha District Council, Rep. by Its ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Sep-28-2006

Reported in: 2007(3)ALD565; 2007(2)ALT679

..... board and gujarat ambhuja cements ltd calcutta c tata housing development co ltd colaba mumbai d larsen toubro limited bangalore e ..... of them an offer was given to all the developers to develop larger chunk of land subsequently another advertisement was issued ..... sent by vuda ten firms namely bengal ambhuja housing development ltd nahalchand laloochand pvt limited mumbai ambience properties limited .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 2006 (HC)

R. Kumar and ors. Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Its Secretary to Gov ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-07-2006

Reported in: (2007)2MLJ384

plan cannot be made and it will destroy the very concept of the highway and the state was not willing to plan master plan detailed development plan or a new town development prepared under this act and shall include the carrying out

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 07 2006 (HC)

Murudeshwara Ceramics Ltd. Reptd by Its Managing Director Satish R. Sh ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-07-2006

Reported in: ILR2007(2)Kar1674; 2007(2)KCCR857; 2007(1)AIRKarR460; AIR2007NOC392(DB)

bangalore v t adinarayanasetty at paragraph 9 wherein the apex court has laid down three cardinal principles in the said case common judgment and awards passed against the karnataka industrial area development board wherein the reference court has determined the market value

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 27 2006 (HC)

Shri Zulal Sayara Rajput and Shri Bhagwan Dharmaji Dhole Vs. the State ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-27-2006

Reported in: 2006(4)ALLMR471; 2007(3)BomCR477; 2006(5)MhLj66

..... that the school being ashram shala is under the control of respondent no 2 tribal development department for the year 1998 99 approval was granted by respondent no 2 for appointment ..... september 2003 is issued by respondent no 2 considering tenor of the above judgment of co ordinate bench we are of the opinion that in the schools having standards v to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 23 2006 (HC)

S.P.A. Offset and Smt. B. Kalaiselvi Vs. the National Small Industries ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Nov-23-2006

Reported in: 2007(1)CTC608

have been initiated by the learned magistrate it is further contended that the object of the negotiable instruments act is to exercises happened prior to the seizure of the machineries subsequent developments may have to be taken into account only during the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 23 2006 (HC)